-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Terminal REP-20: transition to
Review
(#19)
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
10 additions
and
7 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ This repository tracks all REPs proposed by the RSS3 Community. | |
| [REP-1](./REPs/REP-1.md) | Purpose and Guidelines | <[email protected]> | Process | Living | | ||
| [REP-11](./REPs/REP-11.md) | Protocol Upgrade | [BruceXC](mailto:[email protected]), [HenryQW](mailto:[email protected]), [KallyDev](mailto:[email protected]), [Nya Candy](mailto:[email protected]), [polebug](mailto:[email protected]), [pseudoyu](mailto:[email protected]), [Thomas](mailto:[email protected]) | Protocol | Final | | ||
| [REP-16](./REPs/REP-16.md) | Staking Rewards Taxation Adjustment | [Albert](mailto:[email protected]), [HenryQW](mailto:[email protected]) | Core | Review | | ||
| [REP-20](./REPs/REP-20.md) | Data Availability Layer Integration | [Albert](mailto:[email protected]), [HenryQW](mailto:[email protected]) | Core | Draft | | ||
| [REP-20](./REPs/REP-20.md) | Data Availability Layer Integration | [Albert](mailto:[email protected]), [HenryQW](mailto:[email protected]) | Core | Review | | ||
|
||
## License | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
``` | ||
REP: REP-18 | ||
Title: Data Availability Layer Integration | ||
Status: Draft | ||
Status: Review | ||
Type: Core | ||
Created: 23 Apr 2024 | ||
Author(s): Albert <[email protected]>, HenryQW <[email protected]> | ||
|
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ Discussions: <https://forum.rss3.io/t/data-availability-layer-integration/136> | |
- [Abstract](#abstract) | ||
- [Motivation](#motivation) | ||
- [Specification](#specification) | ||
- [DA Solutions](#da-solutions) | ||
- [Blob Space prices](#blob-space-prices) | ||
- [Conclusion](#conclusion) | ||
- [Rationale](#rationale) | ||
|
||
## Abstract | ||
|
@@ -37,15 +40,15 @@ A brief comparison of 4 viable DA solutions that have been explored: | |
| Solution | Security | Cost/Block | Major Advantage | Major Drawback | | ||
| -------- | -------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------- | ------------------------- | | ||
| Avail | Avail's own chain | unknown | unknown | not production ready | | ||
| Celestia | Celestia shared security | ~$0.046 | ease of integration | not the cheapest solution | | ||
| NEAR | On NEAR with Nightshade | ~$0.0016 | huge blob space | development not as active | | ||
| EIP-4844 | the almighty monolithic Ethereum | ~$7.73 | native DA | expensive | | ||
| Celestia | Celestia shared security | \~\$0.046 | ease of integration | not the cheapest solution | | ||
| NEAR | On NEAR with Nightshade | \~\$0.0016 | huge blob space | development not as active | | ||
| EIP-4844 | the almighty monolithic Ethereum | \~\$7.73 | native DA | expensive | | ||
|
||
### Blob Space prices | ||
|
||
EIP-4844 as the native solution suffers from limited blob space per block (as of proto-danksharding). As more and more L2s are competing for **768kb per block** (8,192kb for full-danksharding in the future), surging activities such as ethscription minting on L2s will drive up the blob prices and increase the cost of operating the VSL. NEAR DA promises a whopping blob space of **4,096kb per transaction**, effectively circumventing such issues. This may even accelerate our experiments with different use cases that demand additional onchain storage space. | ||
|
||
In our tests, NEAR DA has shown to be the most cost-effective solution for the VSL, with a cost per block of ~$0.0054 (higher than the claim but still remains the lowest). | ||
In our tests, NEAR DA has shown to be the most cost-effective solution for the VSL, with a cost per block of \~\$0.0054 (higher than the claim but still remains the lowest). | ||
|
||
### Conclusion | ||
|
||
|
@@ -57,4 +60,4 @@ At the same time, the Whitepaper will be updated to reflect the changes. | |
The proposed adjustment will reduce: | ||
|
||
1. Gas fee for all transactions taking place on the VSL. | ||
1. DAL-related operational cost of the VSL. | ||
2. DAL-related operational cost of the VSL. |