Firebase - get token #17027
Firebase - get token #17027
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughA new "Get Token" action module was added to the Firebase Admin SDK integration, enabling retrieval of an OAuth token from a Firestore admin account. The module provides an asynchronous method to obtain the token using the Firebase instance. Additionally, the package version was incremented from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GetTokenAction
participant FirebaseAdminSDK
User->>GetTokenAction: Invoke run()
GetTokenAction->>FirebaseAdminSDK: _getToken()
FirebaseAdminSDK-->>GetTokenAction: Return OAuth token
GetTokenAction-->>User: Return token and summary
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/firebase_admin_sdk/actions/get-token/get-token.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/firebase_admin_sdk/actions/get-token/get-token.mjs (1)
14-14: Fix typo in success message.There's a spelling error in the success message.
- $.export("$summary", "Succesfully retrieved OAuth token"); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved OAuth token");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/firebase_admin_sdk/actions/get-token/get-token.mjs(1 hunks)components/firebase_admin_sdk/package.json(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/firebase_admin_sdk/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.The patch version increment from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 correctly reflects the addition of a new action module without breaking existing functionality.
components/firebase_admin_sdk/actions/get-token/get-token.mjs (1)
13-13:✅ Verification successful
Verify the _getToken() method exists on the Firebase instance.
Ensure that the
_getToken()method is available on the Firebase Admin SDK app instance.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for _getToken method definition in the Firebase admin SDK app # Expected: Find the method definition or usage to confirm it exists # Search for _getToken method definition rg -A 5 "_getToken" --type js --type mjs # Also search for the firebase app file to understand the API fd "firebase_admin_sdk.app.mjs" --exec cat {}Length of output: 7158
_getToken() Method Verified
The
_getToken()method is defined incomponents/firebase_admin_sdk/firebase_admin_sdk.app.mjsunder themethodssection. No further changes are necessary.
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const token = await this.firebase._getToken(); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Succesfully retrieved OAuth token"); | ||
| return token; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and consider security implications.
The current implementation has several concerns:
- Missing error handling: The
_getToken()call should be wrapped in try-catch - Security consideration: Returning the raw OAuth token may expose sensitive credentials in logs or responses
async run({ $ }) {
- const token = await this.firebase._getToken();
- $.export("$summary", "Succesfully retrieved OAuth token");
- return token;
+ try {
+ const token = await this.firebase._getToken();
+ $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved OAuth token");
+ // Consider if returning the full token is necessary for security
+ return {
+ token,
+ // Or return limited info: tokenType: typeof token, length: token?.length
+ };
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve OAuth token: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const token = await this.firebase._getToken(); | |
| $.export("$summary", "Succesfully retrieved OAuth token"); | |
| return token; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| try { | |
| const token = await this.firebase._getToken(); | |
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved OAuth token"); | |
| // Consider if returning the full token is necessary for security | |
| return { | |
| token, | |
| // Or return limited info: tokenType: typeof token, length: token?.length | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve OAuth token: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/firebase_admin_sdk/actions/get-token/get-token.mjs around lines 12
to 16, the code lacks error handling for the asynchronous _getToken() call and
directly returns the raw OAuth token, which can expose sensitive information.
Wrap the _getToken() call in a try-catch block to handle potential errors
gracefully, and avoid returning the raw token directly; instead, consider
returning a masked version or a success indicator without exposing the token in
logs or responses.
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores