Google drive: adding selection between file URL or path #15457
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the Google Drive component files with significant changes, including version increments for Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
GTFalcao
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/google_drive/common/filePathOrUrl.mjs (1)
12-24: Add validation and error handling.The function should validate inputs and handle edge cases:
- Validate that
previousPropscontains required properties- Handle cases where properties might be undefined
- Consider adding a default case for when
useFileUrlOrPathhas unexpected valuesexport async function additionalProps(previousProps) { + if (!previousProps?.fileUrl || !previousProps?.filePath) { + throw new Error('previousProps must contain fileUrl and filePath properties'); + } + const { useFileUrlOrPath } = this; if (useFileUrlOrPath === "File URL") { previousProps.fileUrl.hidden = false; previousProps.filePath.hidden = true; } else if (useFileUrlOrPath === "File Path") { previousProps.fileUrl.hidden = true; previousProps.filePath.hidden = false; + } else { + // Default to showing both options if value is unexpected + previousProps.fileUrl.hidden = false; + previousProps.filePath.hidden = false; } return {}; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs(2 hunks)components/google_drive/common/filePathOrUrl.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/google_drive/common/filePathOrUrl.mjs (1)
1-10: LGTM! Clear and well-structured configuration object.The
useFileUrlOrPathconstant provides a clear interface for selecting between file URL and path options, with appropriate properties for UI integration.components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs (3)
8-10: LGTM! Clean import of new functionality.The imports are well-organized and properly structured.
16-16: LGTM! Version bump and property additions are appropriate.The major version bump to 1.0.0 correctly reflects the breaking changes in the component's interface.
Also applies to: 18-18, 21-21
46-47: Verify validation behavior for required fields.Both
fileUrlandfilePathare marked as required (optional: false) but hidden by default. This might cause validation errors before the user has a chance to select their preferred input method.Consider one of these approaches:
- Make fields optional and add validation in the run method
- Add default values
- Add validation in the UI layer
Let's verify the current behavior:
#!/bin/bash # Search for validation logic in the codebase rg -A 5 "validation|validate" components/google_drive/Also applies to: 54-55
|
Hello everyone, I have tested this PR and there're some test cases failed or needed improvement. Please check the test report below for more information |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/google_drive/common/filePathOrUrl.mjs (1)
1-10: Enhance the description and extract options as constants.The implementation looks good, but consider these improvements:
- Make the description more specific about the
/tmpfolder limitations.- Extract the options array as a constant to ensure consistency across the codebase.
Apply this diff:
+export const FILE_SOURCE_OPTIONS = { + FILE_URL: "File URL", + FILE_PATH: "File Path", +}; export const updateType = { type: "string", label: "Use File URL or File Path", - description: "Whether to upload a file from a URL or from the `/tmp` folder", + description: "Whether to upload a file from a URL or from the `/tmp` folder. Note: File path must be within the `/tmp` directory for security reasons.", options: [ - "File URL", - "File Path", + FILE_SOURCE_OPTIONS.FILE_URL, + FILE_SOURCE_OPTIONS.FILE_PATH, ], reloadProps: true, };components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs (1)
107-109: Improve file path handling.The file path manipulation logic could be more robust and reusable.
Consider moving this logic to a utility function:
// In common/utils.mjs +export function normalizeTmpPath(filePath) { + if (!filePath) return null; + return filePath.startsWith("/tmp/") ? filePath : `/tmp/${filePath}`; +} // In this file - filePath: filePath?.startsWith("/tmp/") - ? filePath - : `/tmp/${filePath}`, + filePath: normalizeTmpPath(filePath),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjs(3 hunks)components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs(2 hunks)components/google_drive/common/filePathOrUrl.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs (3)
8-10: LGTM!The imports are correctly structured and match the exports from
filePathOrUrl.mjs.
41-56: Verify the combination ofoptional: falseandhidden: true.The props
fileUrlandfilePathare marked as both required (optional: false) and hidden (hidden: true). This might cause issues if the UI doesn't handle this combination correctly.Let's check if there are any similar patterns in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for props that are both required and hidden rg -A 2 'optional:\s*false' | rg 'hidden:\s*true'Length of output: 573
Verification of Required and Hidden Props Combination
We've confirmed that the pattern where props are marked as both
optional: falseandhidden: trueis used consistently across the codebase (e.g., in both Google Drive actions for "upload-file" and "update-file", as well as in the Gorgias OAuth action). This indicates that the combination is an intentional design decision rather than a mistake. It implies that these values are provided through internal configuration rather than being expected for manual input via the UI.
- Occurrences verified in:
components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjscomponents/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjscomponents/gorgias_oauth/actions/create-ticket-message/create-ticket-message.mjsBased on these findings, no immediate change is necessary regarding this usage.
16-16: Verify if version bump to 1.0.0 is justified.The version bump to 1.0.0 suggests breaking changes. Please confirm if this is intentional and aligns with semantic versioning principles.
❌ Verification inconclusive
🌐 Web query:
What constitutes a major version bump in semantic versioning?💡 Result:
A major version bump in semantic versioning (SemVer) occurs when backward-incompatible changes are introduced to a software's public API. This signals that existing code relying on previous versions may break if upgraded without modifications[1][2][4].
Key criteria for incrementing the major version (X in X.Y.Z):
Breaking API changes:
- Removing or renaming functions/classes
- Altering input/output parameters in non-backward-compatible ways
- Changing default behaviors critical to existing workflows[4][5]
Stability implications:
Major versions ≥1 indicate stable APIs (0.x versions are considered unstable/developmental)[2][4].Dependency impact:
Consumers must manually update their codebase to work with new major versions[3][5].Comparison with other version components
Version Component Trigger Risk Level Example Change Major (X) Breaking API changes High Removing deprecated endpoints[4] Minor (Y) New backward-compatible features Medium Adding optional parameters[2] Patch (Z) Bug fixes Low Fixing memory leaks[2] A common misconception is that major versions must represent monumental shifts – under SemVer, any breaking change requires a major increment, even if small[5]. This strict approach enables precise dependency management while forcing developers to consciously evaluate compatibility costs[3][4].
Major versions act as compatibility boundaries – software specifying dependencies as
<4.0.0can safely use any 3.x release but must explicitly opt-in to 4.x upgrades[4].Citations:
- 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning
- 2: https://arjancodes.com/blog/how-to-implement-semantic-versioning-in-software-projects/
- 3: https://semver.org/spec/v0.1.0.html
- 4: https://semver.org
- 5: https://tom.preston-werner.com/2022/05/23/major-version-numbers-are-not-sacred
- 6: https://community.ynput.io/t/semantic-versioning/1224
Version Bump Review – Confirm Breaking Changes
The major version bump to 1.0.0 is justified only if the changes are non–backward compatible. As per semantic versioning, a major change requires breaking modifications to the public API. In this file, while new props like
additionalPropsandupdateTypehave been introduced and updates tofileUrl/filePathhave been made, please confirm that these changes indeed break compatibility for existing consumers. If these modifications merely extend the API without breaking expected behaviors, a minor version bump might be more appropriate.
|
Hello everyone, I have tested this PR and there're some test cases failed or needed improvement. Please check the test report below for more information |
|
The issue here was, even when the File URL prop was hidden, its value was still there - and File URL took precedence over File Path when uploading a file. So the file was actually being uploaded, but it was uploading from the hidden URL instead of the provided path. Fixed so that the component only looks at either the URL or the path, depending on what the user selected (or neither, if they selected metadata only). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjs (1)
155-166: Consider enhancing error handling for file stream selection.While the logic for file stream selection is correct, consider adding explicit error handling for cases where:
- The selected file source (URL or path) is invalid
- The file is inaccessible
let fileStream; if (updateType === "File URL") { + try { fileStream = await getFileStream({ $, fileUrl, }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to access file from URL: ${error.message}`); + } } else if (updateType === "File Path") { + try { fileStream = await getFileStream({ $, filePath, }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to access file from path: ${error.message}`); + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjs(4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/google_drive/actions/update-file/update-file.mjs (3)
6-6: LGTM: Import of additionalProps.The import aligns with the PR's objective of adding selection between file URL and path.
12-12: LGTM: Version bump and additionalProps.The major version bump to 1.0.0 appropriately reflects the breaking changes in file selection behavior. The additionalProps addition supports the new selection functionality.
Also applies to: 14-14
17-36: LGTM: Props configuration for file selection.The updateType property provides clear options for file selection, and the configuration of fileUrl/filePath props ensures proper validation while maintaining a clean UI.
The implementation addresses the issue mentioned in the PR comments where hidden URL values were taking precedence over file paths.
Also applies to: 60-62, 73-74
|
Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release! |
|
/approve |
Adjusting the behavior in two Google Drive actions
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
updateTypeconstant.Chores