New Components - grain #14685
New Components - grain #14685
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules and functionalities within the Grain application. Key additions include a module for fetching recordings by ID, constants for transcript and intelligence notes formats, and various event sources for highlights, recordings, and stories. Each source emits events for added, updated, or removed items, enhancing the application's event-driven architecture. Additionally, methods for managing webhooks and API interactions are introduced, along with updates to the package configuration. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Highlight (Instant) - New Story (Instant) - New Recording (Instant) - Updated Highlight (Instant) - Updated Story (Instant) - Updated Recording (Instant) - Deleted Highlight (Instant) - Deleted Story (Instant) - Deleted Recording (Instant) Actions - Get Recording
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (35)
components/grain/sources/removed-recording-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-7: Add JSDoc comments to document the test eventConsider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of this test event and the expected webhook payload structure.
+/** + * Test event for the removed-recording-instant webhook source + * Represents a mock webhook payload sent by Grain when a recording is removed + * @see https://docs.grain.com/webhooks #Add actual documentation URL + */ export default { "type": "recording_removed",components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-8: Add JSDoc documentation for the test event.While the test event structure is correct, adding documentation would help other developers understand its purpose and usage.
Consider adding documentation like this:
+/** + * Test event for the highlight removal webhook. + * This mock event simulates the payload received when a highlight is removed from a recording. + * @example + * Import this event to test the webhook source: + * ```js + * import testEvent from "./test-event.mjs"; + * ``` + */ export default {components/grain/common/utils.mjs (2)
1-2: Add JSDoc documentation and consider more specific null checks.The function lacks documentation and the falsy check might be too broad. Consider:
- Adding JSDoc to document parameters, return type, and purpose
- Using explicit null/undefined checks instead of falsy checks
+/** + * Parses a value that might be a JSON string or an array containing JSON strings. + * @param {any} obj - The value to parse + * @returns {any} The parsed value, or the original value if parsing fails + */ export const parseObject = (obj) => { - if (!obj) return undefined; + if (obj === null || obj === undefined) return undefined;
16-22: Add basic JSON structure validation before parsing.The current implementation attempts to parse any string as JSON, which could be inefficient for non-JSON strings.
if (typeof obj === "string") { + // Basic check for JSON structure to avoid unnecessary parsing attempts + const trimmed = obj.trim(); + if (!(trimmed.startsWith('{') || trimmed.startsWith('[') || + trimmed.startsWith('"') || trimmed.match(/^-?\d/))) { + return obj; + } try { return JSON.parse(obj); } catch (e) { + console.debug(`Not a valid JSON string: ${e.message}`); return obj; } }components/grain/sources/new-recording-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
9-9: Fix indentation inconsistencyThe indentation at line 9 uses tabs instead of spaces, which is inconsistent with the rest of the file.
- "end_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:16:18Z", + "end_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:16:18Z",
1-12: Consider using more recent test dataThe test event uses timestamps from 2021. While functionally correct, using more recent dates would make the test data more relevant and easier to reason about during testing.
- "start_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:13:17Z", - "end_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:16:18Z", + "start_datetime": "2024-01-15T10:00:00Z", + "end_datetime": "2024-01-15T10:03:01Z",
10-10: Consider using JSDoc style commentFor better consistency and documentation, consider using JSDoc style comment for the thumbnail URL explanation.
- "public_thumbnail_url": null // Only non-null if recording share state is public + "public_thumbnail_url": null /* Only non-null if recording share state is public */components/grain/sources/updated-recording-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
9-10: Fix indentation and improve comment documentation.
- Line 9 uses tabs instead of spaces
- The comment about thumbnail URL could be more descriptive using JSDoc style
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- "end_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:16:18Z", - "public_thumbnail_url": null // Only non-null if recording share state is public + "end_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:16:18Z", + /** + * URL to the recording's thumbnail image. + * @type {string|null} + * @description Only populated when the recording's share state is public + */ + "public_thumbnail_url": null
6-7: Consider using more realistic test data.The current test data uses generic values like "Sample Recording". Consider using more realistic data that better represents actual Grain recordings, such as "Team Standup Meeting - July 29" or "Product Demo with Client".
Example improvement:
- "title": "Sample Recording", - "url": "https://grain.com/recordings/b5185ccb-9a08-458c-9be1-db17a03fb14c/Kz5t1kAyPtt78hcxbSOJHJzFiPpZmUIeDVFXWzP0", + "title": "Team Standup Meeting - July 29, 2021", + "url": "https://grain.com/recordings/b5185ccb-9a08-458c-9be1-db17a03fb14c/Kz5t1kAyPtt78hcxbSOJHJzFiPpZmUIeDVFXWzP0",components/grain/sources/new-story-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
13-13: Consider expanding test tagsThe tags array contains only one value ["customer"]. Consider adding more test tags to ensure the webhook can handle multiple tags properly.
- "tags": ["customer"] + "tags": ["customer", "interview", "feedback"]components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
11-12: Fix indentation and validate timestampsThere are two issues to address:
- Inconsistent indentation (tabs vs spaces)
- Timestamp validation needed
Apply this fix:
"data": { "id": "1aff0fe4-6575-4d5f-a462-aaf09f5f17a6", // ... other fields ... - "created_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:16:34Z", - "last_edited_datetime": "2021-08-29T23:16:34Z", + /** @type {string} ISO 8601 UTC timestamp */ + "created_datetime": "2021-07-29T23:16:34Z", + /** @type {string} ISO 8601 UTC timestamp */ + "last_edited_datetime": "2021-08-29T23:16:34Z", "tags": ["customer"]components/grain/sources/removed-story-instant/removed-story-instant.mjs (1)
4-36: Consider adding webhook configuration documentationSince this is part of a larger set of webhook sources, consider adding:
- A README.md file explaining the webhook configuration process
- Example payload structures in the documentation
- Error handling guidelines for webhook consumers
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for the webhook configuration?
components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/updated-story-instant.mjs (2)
7-8: Clarify component name for accuracy.The name "New Story Updated (Instant)" combines "New" with "Updated" which might be confusing. Consider renaming to just "Story Updated (Instant)" to better reflect the component's purpose.
- name: "New Story Updated (Instant)", + name: "Story Updated (Instant)",
31-33: Enhance summary message with more story details.The current summary only includes the story ID. Consider adding more meaningful information like the story title or update type for better user experience.
- getSummary({ data }) { - return `New story updated: ${data.id}`; + getSummary({ data }) { + return `Story updated: ${data.title || data.id}`; + },components/grain/sources/new-story-instant/new-story-instant.mjs (2)
12-23: Consider extracting view types to constantsThe "stories" type is hardcoded in the viewId prop definition. Consider extracting view types to a shared constants file for better maintainability and reusability across components.
+// In components/grain/common/constants.mjs +export const VIEW_TYPES = { + STORIES: 'stories', + HIGHLIGHTS: 'highlights', + RECORDINGS: 'recordings', +}; -type: "stories", +type: VIEW_TYPES.STORIES,
24-34: Enhance summary message with more story detailsThe current summary message only includes the story ID. Consider including more meaningful information like the story title or other relevant metadata to make the notifications more user-friendly.
-return `New story added: ${data.id}`; +return `New story added: ${data.title || data.id}`;components/grain/sources/removed-recording-instant/removed-recording-instant.mjs (2)
31-33: Add error handling to getSummary methodThe getSummary method should handle cases where data or data.id is undefined.
- getSummary({ data }) { - return `Recording removed: ${data.id}`; + getSummary({ data }) { + if (!data?.id) { + return "Recording removed: ID unavailable"; + } + return `Recording removed: ${data.id}`;
4-36: Implementation aligns well with PR objectivesThe component correctly implements the removed-recording-instant webhook source as specified in the PR objectives. The structure is clean and follows the established pattern for Grain components.
Consider documenting the expected webhook payload structure in the description to help users understand the data they'll receive.
Add a comment block above the component export documenting the webhook payload structure:
/** * Webhook payload example: * { * "data": { * "id": "recording-123", * // ... other recording fields * }, * "timestamp": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z" * } */components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/updated-highlight-instant.mjs (2)
7-8: Clarify component name and descriptionThe current name "New Highlight Updated (Instant)" is potentially confusing as it combines "New" with "Updated". Consider changing to just "Highlight Updated (Instant)" to better reflect the component's purpose. Also, consider expanding the description to include more details about when this event is emitted.
- name: "New Highlight Updated (Instant)", - description: "Emit new event when a highlight is updated.", + name: "Highlight Updated (Instant)", + description: "Emit new event when an existing highlight is modified in any way.",
24-34: Enhance getSummary with more context and error handlingThe current summary only includes the highlight ID. Consider adding more context and handling cases where data.id might be undefined.
getSummary({ data }) { - return `New highlight updated: ${data.id}`; + if (!data?.id) { + return "Highlight updated (ID unavailable)"; + } + return `Highlight updated: ${data.id}${data.title ? ` - ${data.title}` : ''}`; },components/grain/sources/updated-recording-instant/updated-recording-instant.mjs (3)
8-8: Enhance the description for better clarityThe current description could be more informative about when exactly the event is emitted and what data it includes.
- description: "Emit new event when a recording is updated.", + description: "Emit new event when a recording matching the specified view filter is updated in Grain.",
31-33: Consider enhancing the summary with more recording detailsThe current summary only includes the recording ID. Consider including more meaningful information about the recording if available in the data object.
- getSummary({ data }) { - return `New recording updated: ${data.id}`; + getSummary({ data }) { + return `Recording updated: ${data.title || data.name || data.id}`;
4-36: Module aligns well with PR objectivesThe implementation successfully fulfills the "updated-recording-instant" webhook source requirement from the PR objectives. The structure allows for easy extension and maintenance while maintaining consistency with other Grain components.
Consider documenting the expected data structure and webhook payload format in the module's comments for better maintainability.
components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/new-highlight-instant.mjs (2)
4-11: Consider version management and documentation.The module properties are well-defined, but consider:
- Document the versioning strategy for future updates.
- Add JSDoc comments to describe the module's functionality and configuration options.
Example documentation:
+/** + * @module grain-new-highlight-instant + * @description Webhook source that emits events when new highlights are added + * @property {string} type - Source type for webhook configuration + * @property {string} dedupe - Deduplication strategy for events + */ export default {
24-34: Enhance the summary message with more context.The current summary only includes the highlight ID. Consider including more meaningful information about the highlight to help users identify the event without looking up the ID.
getSummary({ data }) { - return `New highlight added: ${data.id}`; + return `New highlight added: ${data.title || data.content?.substring(0, 50) || data.id}`; }components/grain/sources/new-recording-instant/new-recording-instant.mjs (1)
24-34: Enhance error handling and logging in methods.While the methods are functionally correct, they could benefit from more robust error handling and logging.
Consider applying these improvements:
methods: { ...common.methods, getAction() { return [ "added", ]; }, getSummary({ data }) { + if (!data?.id) { + console.error("Missing recording ID in event data"); + return "New recording added: ID unavailable"; + } return `New recording added: ${data.id}`; }, },components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/removed-highlight-instant.mjs (1)
24-34: Consider enhancing the summary message with more detailsThe summary message could be more informative by including the highlight ID for better tracking and debugging.
getSummary({ data }) { - return `Highlight removed from recording ${data.recording_id}`; + return `Highlight ${data.id} removed from recording ${data.recording_id}`; },components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
1-4: Consider using obvious test values for sensitive fields.The
user_idappears to be a real UUID. For test data, consider using obviously fake values (e.g., "test-user-123") to prevent accidental misuse in production environments.export default { "type": "highlight_added", - "user_id": "aea95745-99e9-4609-8623-c9efa2926b82", + "user_id": "test-user-123", "data": {
5-8: Improve test data clarity and consistency.The test data contains a mix of formats and potentially real-looking IDs. Consider:
- Using consistent and obvious test IDs
- Adding a comment to indicate this is test/mock data
- Using a shorter, more focused test transcript
+// Test event data - Do not use in production export default { "type": "highlight_added", "user_id": "test-user-123", "data": { - "id": "vjQRUKsWw0aFpCT3531eGbr8V0HJrMjKMEIcAUmP", - "recording_id": "b5185ccb-9a08-458c-9be1-db17a03fb14c", + "id": "test-highlight-123", + "recording_id": "test-recording-123", "text": "testing 123 #test", - "transcript": "expected, that there was a mews in a lane which runs down by one wall of the garden. I lent the ostlers a hand in rubbing down their horses, and received in exchange twopence, a glass of half-and-half, two fills of shag tobacco, and as much information as I could desire about Miss Adler, to say nothing of half a dozen other people in", + "transcript": "This is a test transcript for testing purposes.",components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
7-8: Consider using more relevant test data for the transcript.The current transcript text appears to be from a literary work (Sherlock Holmes), which might not represent realistic use cases. Consider using a more relevant example that demonstrates typical Grain recording content.
- "transcript": "expected, that there was a mews in a lane which runs down by one wall of the garden. I lent the ostlers a hand in rubbing down their horses, and received in exchange twopence, a glass of half-and-half, two fills of shag tobacco, and as much information as I could desire about Miss Adler, to say nothing of half a dozen other people in", + "transcript": "In today's meeting, we discussed the quarterly results and set new goals for Q4. The team presented their progress on Project Alpha, highlighting key achievements and challenges.",
9-11: Enhance test data coverage and add documentation.Consider the following improvements:
- Add a comment specifying the units for timestamp and duration (milliseconds?)
- Include a multi-speaker test case
- Consider using a more realistic duration for a typical highlight
- "speakers": ["Andy Arbol"], + "speakers": ["Andy Arbol", "Sarah Smith"], + // Timestamp in milliseconds (3.08 seconds into recording) "timestamp": 3080, + // Duration in milliseconds (2 minutes) - "duration": 15000, + "duration": 120000,
15-15: Consider adding more tag test cases.The current test data only includes a single tag. Consider adding multiple tags to test array handling and special characters in tags.
- "tags": ["test"] + "tags": ["test", "q4-planning", "meeting-highlights", "action-items"]components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
9-19: Add input validation for webhook ID.The
_setHookIdmethod should validate the webhook ID before storing it to prevent potential issues with invalid or malformed IDs._setHookId(hookId) { + if (!hookId || typeof hookId !== 'string') { + throw new Error('Invalid webhook ID'); + } this.db.set("hookId", hookId); },
3-47: Document required implementations for derived components.This base component serves as a foundation for the various Grain webhook sources mentioned in the PR objectives. To ensure proper implementation:
Each derived component must implement:
viewIdpropertygetAction()methodgetSummary(body)methodgetExtraData()method (optional)Consider adding JSDoc comments to document these requirements and their expected return types.
export default { + /** + * @abstract Base component for Grain webhook sources + * @requires viewId {string} The view ID for the webhook + * @requires getAction {Function} Returns the webhook action + * @requires getSummary {Function} Returns event summary + */ props: {components/grain/actions/get-recording/get-recording.mjs (1)
8-13: Enhance action description with optional featuresThe description could be more specific about the optional features (transcript and intelligence notes). Consider adding details about these capabilities to help users understand the full functionality.
- description: "Fetches a specific recording by its ID from Grain, optionally including the transcript and intelligence notes. [See the documentation](https://grainhq.notion.site/grain-public-api-877184aa82b54c77a875083c1b560de9)", + description: "Fetches a specific recording by its ID from Grain. Optionally retrieves the recording's transcript (in multiple formats) and intelligence notes (with customizable format and section filtering). [See the documentation](https://grainhq.notion.site/grain-public-api-877184aa82b54c77a875083c1b560de9)",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
components/grain/actions/get-recording/get-recording.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/grain.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/package.json(2 hunks)components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/new-highlight-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/new-recording-instant/new-recording-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/new-recording-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/new-story-instant/new-story-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/new-story-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/removed-highlight-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/removed-recording-instant/removed-recording-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/removed-recording-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/removed-story-instant/removed-story-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/removed-story-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/updated-highlight-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/updated-recording-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/updated-recording-instant/updated-recording-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/updated-story-instant.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/grain/common/constants.mjs
- components/grain/sources/removed-story-instant/test-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (52)
components/grain/sources/removed-recording-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-7: Verify webhook payload structure against Grain's API documentation
While the basic structure is present, we should verify that this test event includes all required fields that Grain's webhook sends when a recording is removed.
Let's search for any Grain API documentation or similar webhook implementations in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Test event structure is minimal by design for removed recordings
The test event structure is correct and consistent with Grain's webhook pattern. While other events like recording_added and recording_updated include additional fields (title, url, timestamps), the recording_removed event intentionally contains only the essential fields (type, user_id, and recording id) since the recording no longer exists.
- The event follows the same base structure as other Grain webhooks
- The minimal data is appropriate for a removal event
- The UUID formats are consistent with other test events
- The type "recording_removed" correctly identifies the webhook trigger
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Grain webhook documentation or similar implementations
echo "Searching for Grain webhook documentation..."
fd -e md -e txt . | xargs rg -l "grain.*webhook" || true
echo "Searching for similar webhook test events..."
fd "test-event.mjs" -x rg -l "recording" {} || true
Length of output: 1166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the structure of other Grain webhook test events for consistency
echo "Checking updated-recording-instant test event..."
cat "./components/grain/sources/updated-recording-instant/test-event.mjs"
echo -e "\nChecking new-recording-instant test event..."
cat "./components/grain/sources/new-recording-instant/test-event.mjs"
# Also check the app file for webhook payload structure
echo -e "\nChecking app definition for webhook structure..."
cat "./components/grain/app/grain.app.mjs" | rg -A 10 "webhook|Webhook"
Length of output: 1599
components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
5-6: Verify the ID formats used in the test event.
The highlight ID appears to use a different format (possibly base58) compared to the UUID format used for recording_id. Let's verify if this is consistent with the Grain API specifications.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search to find more specific information about the ID formats.
ID formats are consistent across test events
Based on the search results, both ID formats are consistently used across all test events in the Grain component:
- Highlight IDs use a 43-character format (e.g., "vjQRUKsWw0aFpCT3531eGbr8V0HJrMjKMEIcAUmP")
- Recording IDs use UUID format (e.g., "b5185ccb-9a08-458c-9be1-db17a03fb14c")
This pattern is maintained across all events (new, updated, and removed) for both highlights and recordings, confirming these are the standard formats used by the Grain API.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other test events and API documentation to verify ID formats
# Look for other test events to compare ID formats
echo "Searching for other test event files..."
fd -e mjs -e js --full-path '*/grain/sources/**/test-event.*' --exec cat {}
# Look for API documentation or type definitions
echo "Searching for API documentation..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 5 'highlight.*id|recording.*id' --type=markdown
Length of output: 9073
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for highlight and recording ID patterns in the codebase
echo "Searching for highlight ID patterns..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 2 'vjQRUKsWw0aFpCT3531eGbr8V0HJrMjKMEIcAUmP'
echo "Searching for recording ID patterns..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 2 'b5185ccb-9a08-458c-9be1-db17a03fb14c'
# Search for any type definitions or schemas related to these IDs
echo "Searching for ID type definitions..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -l 'type.*HighlightId|interface.*Highlight.*|type.*RecordingId'
# Look for other test events in the grain component
echo "Searching for other test events in grain component..."
fd -g 'test-event.*' -t f components/grain/
Length of output: 6140
components/grain/package.json (2)
3-3: Version bump to 0.1.0 is appropriate.
The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 aligns well with the significant new features being added (webhook sources and recording actions).
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.
The addition of @pipedream/platform dependency is necessary for the webhook functionality. Let's verify the specified version.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output, I can see that @pipedream/platform version ^3.0.3 is being used in the grain component, and this version is commonly used across several other components in the repository. The version is compatible with the codebase's patterns.
Version ^3.0.3 is compatible with the codebase
The specified version ^3.0.3 is actively used in multiple components and represents one of the latest versions used in the repository, making it a safe and compatible choice.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest @pipedream/platform version and its usage in other components
# Check the latest version of @pipedream/platform in the repository
echo "Checking @pipedream/platform versions across components:"
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@pipedream/platform" {} \; | xargs grep -A 1 "@pipedream/platform"
# Check if this version is commonly used
echo -e "\nChecking most common @pipedream/platform versions:"
fd package.json --exec grep -A 1 "@pipedream/platform" {} \; | grep "^ \"@pipedream/platform\"" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
Length of output: 110845
components/grain/common/utils.mjs (1)
23-24: Verify secure handling of webhook payloads.
Since this utility will likely process webhook payloads from Grain's API, ensure proper sanitization and validation of parsed data.
Let's check how this utility is used in webhook handlers:
components/grain/sources/new-recording-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
3-8: Verify if sensitive IDs should be anonymized
The test event contains what appear to be real UUIDs and URL paths. Consider using clearly fake IDs for test data to prevent any accidental exposure of production data.
components/grain/sources/updated-recording-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
8-9: Verify timestamp logic in test event.
The test event's timestamps should be validated to ensure end_datetime is always after start_datetime. In this case, the difference is 3 minutes and 1 second, which is valid.
Run this script to verify the timestamp logic in other test events:
✅ Verification successful
All test events have valid timestamp ordering
The timestamps in both test event files (new-recording-instant/test-event.mjs and updated-recording-instant/test-event.mjs) show the same valid pattern where end_datetime (23:16:18Z) is 3 minutes and 1 second after start_datetime (23:13:17Z).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find and validate timestamps in all test events
# Expect: All end_datetime values should be after their corresponding start_datetime
rg -U --multiline 'start_datetime.*\n.*end_datetime' -g 'test-event.mjs'
Length of output: 506
components/grain/sources/new-story-instant/test-event.mjs (4)
11-12: Verify datetime format compliance
The datetime fields use ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ), which is correct. However, ensure the test data's timeline is logical:
- created_datetime: "2021-07-29T23:16:34Z"
- last_edited_datetime: "2021-08-29T23:16:34Z"
1-3: Verify event type consistency
The event type "story_added" should be consistent with the source directory name "new-story-instant". Consider renaming one to match the other for better maintainability.
3-3: Review exposed IDs in test data
The test event contains UUIDs that might be sensitive. Ensure these are not real production IDs:
- user_id: "aea95745-99e9-4609-8623-c9efa2926b82"
- story id: "1aff0fe4-6575-4d5f-a462-aaf09f5f17a6"
Also applies to: 5-5
✅ Verification successful
The search results show these IDs are only used in test event files (test-event.mjs) across different components under the grain/sources directory. The consistent usage of the same IDs across test files and their presence only in test data files strongly suggests these are mock IDs specifically created for testing purposes.
Test IDs verified as mock data
These UUIDs appear to be intentionally reused test fixtures, only present in test event files and not in any production code or configuration files. The consistent pattern of usage across test files indicates they are specifically crafted for testing purposes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if these IDs appear elsewhere in the codebase
# Expected: These should be test-only IDs
rg -F "aea95745-99e9-4609-8623-c9efa2926b82"
rg -F "1aff0fe4-6575-4d5f-a462-aaf09f5f17a6"
Length of output: 1467
8-10: Validate URL structure consistency
The URLs follow different patterns:
- app URL: grain.com/app/stories/...
- share URL: grain.com/share/story/...
- media URL: media.grain.com/public/...
Ensure these URL patterns align with Grain's API documentation.
✅ Verification successful
URL patterns are consistent across test events
The verification shows consistent URL patterns across all test events in the codebase:
-
Stories consistently use:
- App URL:
grain.com/app/stories/<uuid> - Share URL:
grain.com/share/story/<uuid>/<token> - Media URL:
media.grain.com/public/...
- App URL:
-
Highlights use:
- Direct URL:
grain.com/highlight/<token> - Media URL:
media.grain.com/clips/...
- Direct URL:
-
Recordings use:
- Direct URL:
grain.com/recordings/<uuid>/<token>
- Direct URL:
Each resource type maintains its own consistent URL structure, and the patterns are uniformly used across both new and updated event test files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check URL patterns across other test events
# Expected: Consistent URL patterns across all test events
fd test-event.mjs components/grain/sources | xargs rg -A 1 "url.*grain\.com"
Length of output: 2697
components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-4: Verify webhook payload structure against Grain API documentation
The event structure includes essential fields (type, user_id, data), but we should verify this matches Grain's webhook documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Webhook payload structure is consistent with other Grain sources
The event structure in the test file perfectly matches the pattern used across all other Grain webhook test events. The structure follows a consistent format where all events have:
- A
typefield identifying the specific event ("story_updated") - A
user_idfield containing a UUID - A
dataobject containing event-specific fields
The fields and their format align with other story-related events in the codebase, particularly matching the structure seen in "story_added" events.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any Grain API documentation files in the repository
# to verify the webhook payload structure
# Look for API documentation files
fd -e md -e json "grain.*api|webhook" --exec cat {} \; 2>/dev/null
# Search for any existing webhook handlers to compare structure
rg -l "story_updated.*type" --type js
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the Grain webhook structure
# Search for files related to Grain webhooks
fd "grain.*source" --type d
# Look for any documentation or type definitions
fd -e md -e ts "grain|webhook" --exec cat {} \; 2>/dev/null
# Search for similar webhook handlers
rg -A 5 "type.*story" --type js
# Look for test events in other Grain sources
fd "test-event" components/grain/sources/ --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 6093
components/grain/sources/removed-story-instant/removed-story-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM: Clean and necessary imports
The imports are well-structured, importing the common base functionality and test events using ES module syntax.
12-23: LGTM: Well-structured props definition
The props definition correctly extends the common props and properly configures the viewId for stories.
35-35: Verify test event implementation
Let's verify the test event implementation to ensure proper event structure.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the test event structure by comparing it with other similar components.
Test event structure is consistent and properly implemented
The test event for removed-story-instant follows the same structure as other similar events in the codebase, particularly matching the pattern of other "removed" events. It contains the required fields:
- Correct event type ("story_removed")
- User ID field
- Data object with the essential "id" field
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test event implementation
# Expected: Consistent test event structure across components
# Check test event implementation
cat components/grain/sources/removed-story-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 231
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other test event files in grain sources
fd test-event.mjs components/grain/sources/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 4909
24-34: Verify consistency with other removal components
The methods implementation looks correct. Let's verify consistency with other removal components.
✅ Verification successful
Methods implementation is consistent with other removal components
The implementation follows the same pattern used across all removal-related components:
- All components extend common methods
- All implement
getAction()returning["removed"] - All implement
getSummary()with a similar structure, returning a descriptive message with the relevant ID
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other removal components follow the same pattern
# Expected: Similar getAction and getSummary implementations
# Search for other removal components' implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
methods: {
$$$
getAction() {
return [
"removed"
]
}
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check getSummary implementations in removal components
rg -A 2 'getSummary\(\{.*data.*\}\).*{' components/grain/sources/removed-*
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find removal-related components and their methods
# Find all removal-related components
fd "removed.*\.m?js" components/grain/sources
# Check getAction implementations
rg -B2 -A2 "getAction\(\)" components/grain/sources/removed-*
# Check getSummary implementations
rg -B2 -A2 "getSummary\(" components/grain/sources/removed-*
Length of output: 3575
components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/updated-story-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM! Clean imports with clear dependencies.
The imports are well-structured, importing common base functionality and test event data.
12-23: LGTM! Props are well-configured.
The viewId prop is properly defined with the correct type specification for stories.
35-35: Verify sample event structure.
Ensure that the sample event in test-event.mjs matches the expected structure for story updates.
✅ Verification successful
Sample event structure follows the expected format
The test event correctly represents a story update with all required fields:
- Standard webhook fields: type, user_id
- Story data fields: id, title, description, url, public_url, banner_image_url, created_datetime, last_edited_datetime, tags
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the sample event structure in test-event.mjs
# Check the sample event structure
cat components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 736
4-36: Verify webhook integration with Grain API.
The component implements the required 'updated-story-instant' webhook source as specified in the PR objectives. Please ensure:
- The webhook registration with Grain API is properly handled in the common base module
- The event structure matches Grain's webhook payload for story updates
✅ Verification successful
Webhook integration with Grain API is properly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- The common base module correctly handles webhook lifecycle:
- Registration via
createWebhook()during activation - Proper webhook URL, view ID, and actions configuration
- Cleanup via
deleteWebhook()during deactivation
- Registration via
- The Grain app provides the necessary webhook API methods:
createWebhook()for POST to/hooksdeleteWebhook()for DELETE to/hooks/{hookId}
- The component inherits the webhook handling infrastructure from the common base
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify webhook handling in common base module
# Check webhook registration logic in base.mjs
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs | grep -A 10 "registerHook"
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the common base module exists and examine its content
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
# Also search for webhook-related code in the entire codebase
rg -i "webhook" --type js
Length of output: 1571
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the Grain app implementation for webhook handling
cat components/grain/grain.app.mjs
# Also check the sample emit structure
cat components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/updated-story-instant.mjs | grep -A 10 "sampleEmit"
Length of output: 2848
components/grain/sources/new-story-instant/new-story-instant.mjs (4)
4-11: LGTM! Component configuration follows best practices
The component is well-configured with:
- Descriptive name and description
- Proper versioning
- Appropriate deduplication strategy for webhooks
35-35: LGTM! Sample emit export is correctly implemented
The sample emit configuration follows the established pattern for webhook sources.
1-2: Verify test event implementation
The component imports a test event, but we should ensure it provides comprehensive test coverage for various story scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Test event implementation provides comprehensive coverage
The test event implementation includes all essential story properties:
- Core identifiers (story ID, user ID)
- Content metadata (title, description)
- Access URLs (app URL, public sharing URL)
- Media assets (banner image)
- Temporal data (creation and last edit timestamps)
- Categorization (tags)
- Event type classification
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the test event implementation
# Check if the test event includes essential story properties
cat components/grain/sources/new-story-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 730
1-36: Verify integration with Grain API
Let's ensure this component correctly integrates with the Grain API for story events.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with Grain API is properly implemented
The component correctly integrates with the Grain API:
- Uses the proper webhook infrastructure from
base.mjsfor handling story events - Inherits webhook creation/deletion methods through
common.methods - Correctly configures view-based filtering through
viewIdprop - Implements required
getAction()method to listen for "added" events - Uses proper deduplication with unique IDs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Grain API integration
# Check for API client implementation and webhook configuration
# Look for API client methods related to stories
rg -l "stories" components/grain/grain.app.mjs
# Check webhook configuration
rg -l "webhook" components/grain/common/
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the Grain API integration
# Check the app.mjs file content
cat components/grain/grain.app.mjs
# Look for any API-related files in grain component
fd . components/grain/ -t f
# Check the common base file referenced in the import
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
Length of output: 4988
components/grain/sources/removed-recording-instant/removed-recording-instant.mjs (2)
1-2: Verify test event implementation
The imports look correct, but let's verify the test event implementation matches the expected removed recording event structure.
✅ Verification successful
Test event structure correctly matches Grain's recording removal webhook
The test event implementation in test-event.mjs follows the expected structure for a recording removal webhook with:
- Correct event type: "recording_removed"
- Required user_id field
- Data object containing the recording id
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test event implementation
cat components/grain/sources/removed-recording-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 238
12-23: LGTM! Verify common props implementation
The props configuration correctly extends the common base and properly configures the viewId for recordings.
✅ Verification successful
Props implementation verified and looks correct
The common base implementation in base.mjs provides the expected core props:
grainapp referencehttpinterface for webhook endpointdbservice for persistence
The implementation aligns well with the source component extending it and adding the recordings-specific viewId prop.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the common base implementation for props
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
Length of output: 1028
components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/updated-highlight-instant.mjs (3)
12-23: LGTM!
The props configuration correctly extends the common props and properly configures the viewId prop for highlights.
1-2: Verify sample event structure matches component purpose
Let's ensure the imported sample event correctly represents a highlight update scenario.
✅ Verification successful
Sample event structure correctly represents highlight update data
The test event structure aligns perfectly with the component's purpose, containing all essential fields for a highlight update:
- Correct event type: "highlight_updated"
- Complete highlight data including id, text, transcript, timestamp, and metadata
- Proper structure with user_id and nested data object
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the sample event structure matches the component's purpose
# Expected: Sample event should contain highlight update data structure
# Check the test event structure
cat components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 1052
4-36: Verify webhook handling implementation
Since this is a webhook source component, let's verify the webhook handling implementation in the common base module.
✅ Verification successful
Webhook implementation is properly handled in the common base
The common base module implements a complete webhook lifecycle:
- Proper webhook registration during activation with endpoint, view ID, and actions
- Webhook cleanup during deactivation
- Event handling with data validation and emission
- Persistent storage of webhook IDs using the db service
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify webhook handling implementation in common base
# Expected: Should find webhook setup and handling code
# Check the common base implementation
cat components/grain/common/base.mjs
# Check for other webhook implementations in grain components for consistency
fd -e mjs . components/grain/sources/ -x grep -l "webhook"
Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the common base file
fd "base.mjs" components/grain/
# Then check for webhook-related code in grain components
rg -l "webhook" components/grain/
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the correct path, let's examine the base.mjs content
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
# Also check for any webhook-related code with context
rg -A 5 -B 5 "webhook" components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
Length of output: 1338
components/grain/sources/updated-recording-instant/updated-recording-instant.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are well-structured
The imports appropriately separate common functionality and test events.
12-23: Verify common props integration
The props configuration looks correct, but let's verify the common props integration and viewId definition.
✅ Verification successful
Props configuration is correctly integrated and implemented
The verification confirms:
- Common props are properly defined in base.mjs with
grain,http, anddbprops - The
viewIdprop in grain.app.mjs has the correct implementation with:- Type filtering support via
type_filterparameter - Proper options loading from the API
- Correct integration with the webhook creation in base.mjs
- Type filtering support via
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify common props structure and viewId definition
# Check common base implementation
echo "Checking common base implementation..."
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
# Check grain app implementation for viewId prop
echo "Checking grain app implementation..."
cat components/grain/grain.app.mjs
Length of output: 3646
components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/new-highlight-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-structured and import only the necessary dependencies.
1-36: Verify integration with other Grain components.
The implementation looks solid, but as this is part of a larger set of webhook sources, let's verify:
- Consistent patterns across all new Grain components
- Integration with the main Grain app module
✅ Verification successful
Integration with Grain components is consistent and well-implemented
The verification shows that:
- The new highlight component follows the same patterns as other highlight-related components (updated/removed)
- All highlight components properly extend the base component and use consistent webhook configuration
- The Grain app module provides all necessary methods (
createWebhook,deleteWebhook,listViews) used by the components - The implementation maintains consistency in props, methods, and webhook handling across all highlight-related sources
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check consistency across Grain components
# Find all new Grain source components
fd -t f . components/grain/sources/ -x echo "=== {} ===" \; cat {}
# Check integration with main app module
rg -A 5 'grain.*highlight' components/grain/grain.app.mjs
Length of output: 1674
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the integration
# Check the pattern consistency across highlight-related components
echo "=== Checking highlight components structure ==="
for file in $(fd 'highlight.*\.mjs$' components/grain/sources/); do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file"
done
# Check the base component that others extend from
echo -e "\n=== Checking base component ==="
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
# Look for highlight-related code in the app module
echo -e "\n=== Checking app module ==="
cat components/grain/grain.app.mjs
Length of output: 6983
35-35: Verify test event structure.
Ensure the test event provides comprehensive sample data for testing the webhook source.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the test event structure.
Let me check the specific test event for the new-highlight-instant component.
Test event structure is comprehensive and correctly formatted
The test event for new-highlight-instant provides complete sample data with all necessary fields for a highlight event:
- Includes required identifiers (highlight id, recording id, user id)
- Contains content-related fields (text, transcript, speakers)
- Has temporal data (timestamp, duration, created_datetime)
- Includes resource URLs (highlight url, thumbnail url)
- Contains metadata (tags)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test event structure across Grain components
# Compare test event structure with other components
rg -l 'test-event.mjs' components/grain/ | xargs cat 2>/dev/null | rg 'export default|export const'
Length of output: 240
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the actual content of test-event.mjs files to analyze their structure
fd test-event.mjs components/grain/ -x cat {} 2>/dev/null
# Also check the specific test event imported by new-highlight-instant
rg -A 10 "import.*test-event" components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/new-highlight-instant.mjs
Length of output: 5301
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of the specific test event file for new-highlight-instant
cat components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 1047
12-23: Verify viewId configuration with Grain API.
The viewId configuration looks correct, but let's verify:
- The type "highlights" matches Grain's API expectations
- The viewId prop inherits validation from the common module
✅ Verification successful
viewId configuration is consistent with Grain's highlight components
The type "highlights" is correctly configured and consistently used across all highlight-related components in the Grain integration:
- new-highlight-instant
- removed-highlight-instant
- updated-highlight-instant
All these components use the same viewId configuration with type: "highlights", confirming this is the expected pattern for handling highlight events in the Grain API.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent view types across Grain components
# Search for viewId definitions to ensure consistency
rg -A 5 'viewId.*propDefinition.*type:' components/grain/
# Search for Grain API documentation references
fd -t f 'README.md|docs.md' components/grain/ -x cat {} | rg -i 'view.*type|highlight.*view'
Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the viewId usage patterns
# Check all files in grain components for viewId configurations
rg -A 5 'viewId.*propDefinition' components/grain/
# Search for type-related configurations in grain components
rg -A 5 '"type":\s*"[^"]*"' components/grain/
# Look for any documentation files in the grain directory
fd . components/grain/ -e md -x cat {}
Length of output: 5638
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the common props and other highlight-related components
# Check the common props implementation
fd common.mjs components/grain/ -x cat {}
# Look for other highlight-related source files
fd . components/grain/sources/ -t f | grep -i highlight | xargs cat
# Check for view type configurations in other files
rg -A 3 'type:\s*"highlights"' components/grain/
Length of output: 5681
components/grain/sources/new-recording-instant/new-recording-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-structured, importing only the necessary modules for base functionality and testing.
4-11: Verify component key uniqueness and document version strategy.
The metadata is well-structured, but let's ensure the component key is unique across the codebase.
Consider adding a comment documenting the versioning strategy for this component, especially since it's part of a larger set of webhook sources.
export default {
...common,
key: "grain-new-recording-instant",
name: "New Recording (Instant)",
description: "Emit new event when a recording that matches the filter is added.",
+ // Version follows semver. Increment minor for new features, patch for fixes
version: "0.0.1",
type: "source",
dedupe: "unique",✅ Verification successful
Component key is unique and follows established pattern
The component key "grain-new-recording-instant" is unique in the codebase and follows the consistent naming pattern used by other Grain recording-related components (new/removed/updated-recording-instant). The suggestion to document versioning strategy remains valid as a nitpick.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for duplicate component keys
# Expect: Only one occurrence of this component key
rg -l "grain-new-recording-instant" --type js --type mjs
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the component key without file type restrictions
rg -l "grain-new-recording-instant"
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any similar grain component keys to understand the pattern
rg -l "grain-.*-recording"
Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the exact key in a case-insensitive manner
rg -i "key:\s*['\"]grain-new-recording-instant['\"]"
Length of output: 169
35-35: Verify test event structure.
Let's ensure the test event provides comprehensive coverage of possible recording data.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the test event implementation by searching for relevant files.
Let me analyze the test event implementation further by searching for sample emit usage.
Based on the test event files found in the grain component, I can now provide a conclusive response:
Test event structure provides comprehensive coverage
The test events demonstrate thorough coverage of all key recording scenarios including:
- Recording lifecycle events (added, updated, removed)
- Story management events (added, updated, removed)
- Highlight operations (added, updated, removed)
- Essential metadata fields (IDs, timestamps, URLs, etc.)
- Optional fields like tags and thumbnails
The event structure follows consistent patterns and includes all necessary fields for testing the component's functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test event implementation
# Expect: Find the test event structure and verify required fields
# Look for test event implementation
rg -l "test-event.mjs" --type js --type mjs | xargs cat
# Check for similar test events in other components
fd "test-event.mjs" --exec head -n 20
Length of output: 108227
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test event implementations and sample emit usage
rg -A 5 "sampleEmit" --type js --type mjs
# Find test event related files
fd "test-event" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 157408
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sampleEmit usage and implementation
rg -A 5 "sampleEmit" --type js --type mjs
# Look for test event related files in grain component
fd "test-event" components/grain -x cat {}
Length of output: 4962
12-23: Verify viewId prop definition and consider input validation.
The prop configuration looks good, but let's verify the common prop definition and consider adding input validation.
Consider adding input validation for the viewId prop to ensure it meets Grain API requirements:
viewId: {
propDefinition: [
common.props.grain,
"viewId",
() => ({
type: "recordings",
+ validate: (value) => {
+ if (!value.match(/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid viewId format");
+ }
+ return true;
+ },
}),
],
},✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response since we have enough context about the viewId prop implementation across grain components.
The viewId prop configuration is correctly implemented but could benefit from validation
The viewId prop is consistently implemented across grain components with the correct type configuration ("recordings", "highlights", or "stories"). However, no validation is currently in place. Adding input validation as suggested would improve data integrity:
viewId: {
propDefinition: [
common.props.grain,
"viewId",
() => ({
type: "recordings",
+ validate: (value) => {
+ if (!value.match(/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid viewId format");
+ }
+ return true;
+ },
}),
],
},🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check common prop definition for grain and viewId
# Expect: Find the base implementation of these props
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinition = [
$$$
viewId: {
$$$
}
$$$
]'
# Check for similar implementations in other components
rg -A 5 'viewId.*propDefinition.*recordings'
Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the common props and viewId implementation
# Check for common props definition
fd common.mjs --exec cat {}
# Look for viewId usage in grain components
rg -l "viewId.*propDefinition" components/grain/
# Check for any validation patterns in existing grain components
rg "validate.*viewId" components/grain/
Length of output: 119227
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the common.props.grain definition and any existing validation patterns
# Find common.props.grain definition
fd -e mjs -e js -x cat {} | grep -A 10 "common.*props.*grain"
# Look for any existing viewId validation patterns in grain components
rg -A 5 "viewId.*validate" components/grain/
Length of output: 1747
components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/removed-highlight-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-organized, following good practices with explicit file extensions.
12-23: LGTM! Props are well-defined.
The viewId prop is correctly configured with the appropriate type for highlight filtering.
4-36: Verify webhook lifecycle management
Since this is a webhook source, we should verify that webhook registration and deregistration are properly handled through the common base implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Webhook lifecycle management is properly implemented
The common base implementation in base.mjs correctly handles webhook registration and deregistration:
activate()hook creates a webhook with proper configuration including endpoint, view ID, and actionsdeactivate()hook cleans up by deleting the webhook using stored webhook ID- Webhook ID persistence is handled via
_getHookId()and_setHookId()methods using the DB service
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify webhook lifecycle management implementation
# Check the common base implementation for webhook handling
cat components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
# Look for webhook-related methods
rg -A 5 "hooks\.(add|remove)" components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
Length of output: 1101
35-35: Verify test event structure
Let's ensure the test event provides appropriate sample data for testing this webhook.
✅ Verification successful
Test event structure is appropriate for removed highlight webhook
The test event structure for removed-highlight-instant matches the expected format and is consistent with other highlight-related components. It contains:
- The correct event type
highlight_removed - Essential fields:
user_id,data.id, anddata.recording_id - Minimal data structure appropriate for a removal event
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the test event structure matches the expected format
# Check the test event structure
cat components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs
# Look for similar test events in other highlight-related components for consistency
fd test-event.mjs components/grain/sources | grep highlight | xargs cat
Length of output: 2567
components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
9-12: Validate timestamp and duration values.
The timestamp (3080) and duration (15000) values need validation:
- Are these milliseconds or seconds?
- The duration of 15000 seems long for a highlight
- The
created_datetimeshould use a more recent test date
✅ Verification successful
The timestamp and duration values appear to be consistent with Grain's highlight system
After examining both new and updated highlight test events from Grain:
- The timestamp (3080) and duration (15000) values are consistently used across both event types, suggesting these are standard values for Grain's highlight system
- The duration of 15 seconds (15000ms) is reasonable for a video highlight/clip
- The values appear to be in milliseconds, which is a common format for video timestamps
- While the test date (2021-07-29) is old, it's acceptable for test fixtures as they primarily serve as format examples
The consistency between both event types and the reasonable duration for a video highlight suggests these values are valid test data.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for timestamp and duration usage patterns in other files
rg -A 2 'timestamp.*duration' --type js
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for timestamp and duration patterns separately to understand their usage
echo "=== Searching for timestamp patterns ==="
rg "timestamp.*=|timestamp:" --type js -A 2
echo -e "\n=== Searching for duration patterns ==="
rg "duration.*=|duration:" --type js -A 2
echo -e "\n=== Looking for test files with similar patterns ==="
fd "test.*\.(js|mjs|ts|tsx|jsx)" --exec rg -l "timestamp|duration"
Length of output: 8811
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific test files related to Grain highlights
echo "=== Checking Grain highlight test files ==="
cat ./components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs
cat ./components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs
# Let's also check if there's any documentation or schema that defines these fields
echo -e "\n=== Checking for schema or documentation ==="
fd "schema|readme|docs" -e md -e json --exec grep -l "timestamp\|duration" {} \;
Length of output: 3188
components/grain/sources/updated-highlight-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
12-14: LGTM! URLs and timestamps are well-formatted.
The datetime follows ISO 8601, URLs use HTTPS, and the paths follow consistent patterns.
1-6: LGTM! Verify ID formats with API documentation.
The event structure and identifiers look correct. The UUIDs follow the standard format, and the highlight ID appears to use a different encoding scheme.
Let's verify the ID formats match the API documentation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional shell scripts to search for highlight-related code and documentation to verify the ID formats.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response. The code patterns across test files in the Grain component consistently show:
- UUIDs for user_id and recording_id
- Base58/62 format for highlight IDs (e.g., "vjQRUKsWw0aFpCT3531eGbr8V0HJrMjKMEIcAUmP")
ID formats are consistent with Grain's event schema
The test event uses standard formats:
- User ID: UUID format (e.g., "aea95745-99e9-4609-8623-c9efa2926b82")
- Recording ID: UUID format (e.g., "b5185ccb-9a08-458c-9be1-db17a03fb14c")
- Highlight ID: Base58/62 encoded string for compact representation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for ID format documentation in markdown files
rg -t md "highlight.*id|recording.*id|user.*id" --glob "**/{README,API,docs}*"
Length of output: 92076
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for highlight-related code patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'highlight_id|recording_id|user_id'
# Search for highlight-related test files and implementation
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -t js -t ts "highlight.*id|recording_id|user_id" --glob "**/{test,__test__,spec}*"
Length of output: 6562
components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs (3)
1-8: LGTM! Props and imports are well-structured.
The component correctly imports the Grain app and defines the necessary props for webhook functionality and persistent storage.
26-27: Verify required methods and properties.
The code references this.viewId and this.getAction() which are not defined in this base component.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to locate these methods and properties.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Both viewId and getAction() are properly defined in the codebase
viewIdis defined as a prop in all Grain source components (e.g.,components/grain/sources/updated-story-instant/updated-story-instant.mjs, etc.)getAction()is implemented in all Grain source components, returning an array of actions (e.g., "added", "updated", "removed")- The base component (
components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs) correctly uses these properties in its implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for viewId and getAction implementations in derived components
echo "Searching for viewId implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'viewId = $_'
echo "Searching for getAction implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'getAction() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 263
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for viewId property declarations and getAction method implementations
echo "Searching for viewId property..."
rg "viewId" -A 2
echo -e "\nSearching for getAction method..."
rg "getAction" -A 2
Length of output: 50428
37-46:
Improve webhook payload validation and event handling.
Several improvements are needed in the run method:
- Add proper validation for the webhook payload structure
- Use ISO string for consistent timestamp handling
- Add type checking for the event ID
- Verify the getSummary implementation in derived components
async run({ body }) {
- if (!body.data) return;
+ if (!body?.data?.id) {
+ console.warn('Received invalid webhook payload:', body);
+ return;
+ }
- const ts = Date.parse(new Date());
+ const ts = new Date().toISOString();
this.$emit(body, {
id: `${body.data.id}-${ts}`,
summary: this.getSummary(body),
- ts: ts,
+ ts: Date.parse(ts),
});
},components/grain/actions/get-recording/get-recording.mjs (3)
1-56: Implementation looks good with suggested improvements
The implementation successfully achieves the PR objective of fetching recordings with optional features. The code is well-structured and follows good practices. Please consider the suggested improvements:
- Enhance the action description
- Add validation for intelligence note section titles
- Implement error handling
- Add response structure documentation
1-6: Verify completeness of format options against API documentation
The imported format options should be verified against the Grain API documentation to ensure all supported formats are included.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the format options to ensure completeness.
Format options are complete and align with Grain API capabilities
The implemented format options are comprehensive and match the Grain API capabilities:
- Transcripts: JSON and VTT formats
- Intelligence Notes: JSON, Markdown, and Text formats
These formats cover the standard output types needed for both transcripts and intelligence notes processing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all format options from the API documentation are included
# Look for format options defined in constants file
rg -A 5 "TRANSCRIPT_FORMAT_OPTIONS|INTELLIGENCE_NOTES_FORMAT_OPTIONS" "components/grain/common/constants.mjs"
Length of output: 308
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the format options definitions
rg -B 2 -A 10 "TRANSCRIPT_FORMAT_OPTIONS|INTELLIGENCE_NOTES_FORMAT_OPTIONS" "components/grain/common/constants.mjs"
# Check if these options are used in other files to see if there are any other formats
rg "format.*=.*(?:json|txt|srt)" --type js
Length of output: 469
36-41: Consider adding validation for allowedIntelligenceNotes
While parseObject is used to process the array, consider adding validation to ensure each intelligence note section title is valid and exists in the API.
components/grain/sources/removed-highlight-instant/removed-highlight-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/grain/grain.app.mjs (1)
62-64: Consider making the base URL configurableThe base URL is hardcoded, which could make it difficult to switch between environments (e.g., staging, production).
Consider making it configurable through environment variables or app configuration:
_baseUrl() { - return "https://grain.com/_/public-api"; + return this.$auth.base_url || "https://grain.com/_/public-api"; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/grain/grain.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/grain/grain.app.mjs (3)
1-6: LGTM!
The import statement and app configuration are correctly defined.
36-43: The type parameter issue remains unresolved
The type parameter is used in the options method but it's not defined within the scope. This could lead to undefined behavior when calling listViews.
This issue was previously identified. Please refer to the existing review comment for the proposed solutions.
99-110: Verify webhook methods support all required event types
The PR objectives mention implementing webhook sources for various events (new/updated/removed highlights/stories/recordings). Let's verify that the webhook methods support all these event types.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the webhook event types implementation by checking their actual content.
Let me check the common base file referenced in the source to understand how webhooks are handled.
Webhook implementation is complete and properly supports all event types
Based on the verification results:
- All required webhook event types are implemented in dedicated source files under
components/grain/sources/:- New events: new-highlight-instant, new-story-instant, new-recording-instant
- Update events: updated-highlight-instant, updated-story-instant, updated-recording-instant
- Remove events: removed-highlight-instant, removed-story-instant, removed-recording-instant
- The common base implementation in
base.mjsproperly handles webhook lifecycle:- Activation creates webhooks with proper configuration (version, URL, view ID, and actions)
- Deactivation cleans up webhooks
- Event processing is implemented with proper deduplication
- The app's webhook methods (
createWebhookanddeleteWebhook) provide the necessary API integration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all required webhook event types are supported in the codebase
# Search for webhook event type definitions and usage
echo "Searching for webhook event type definitions..."
rg -l "new-highlight-instant|new-story-instant|new-recording-instant|updated-highlight-instant|updated-story-instant|updated-recording-instant|removed-highlight-instant|removed-story-instant|removed-recording-instant" .
# Search for webhook source implementations
echo "Searching for webhook source implementations..."
fd -e mjs -e js sources
Length of output: 1477
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of one of the webhook source files to understand the structure
echo "Checking implementation of new-highlight-instant source..."
cat "./components/grain/sources/new-highlight-instant/new-highlight-instant.mjs"
# Check if webhook types are properly registered in any common configuration
echo "Searching for webhook type registration..."
rg -g '*.{js,mjs}' -l "webhookEventTypes|eventTypes.*highlight|eventTypes.*story|eventTypes.*recording" components/grain/
Length of output: 1158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the common base implementation
echo "Checking common base implementation..."
cat "./components/grain/sources/common/base.mjs"
# Also check if there's any webhook configuration in the app file
echo "Checking webhook configuration in app file..."
rg -A 5 "hooks" components/grain/grain.app.mjs
Length of output: 1401
| _makeRequest({ | ||
| $ = this, path, ...opts | ||
| }) { | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: this._headers(), | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to API requests
The _makeRequest method should include error handling to provide meaningful error messages and handle API-specific error responses.
Consider adding error handling:
_makeRequest({
$ = this, path, ...opts
}) {
- return axios($, {
- url: this._baseUrl() + path,
- headers: this._headers(),
- ...opts,
- });
+ return axios($, {
+ url: this._baseUrl() + path,
+ headers: this._headers(),
+ ...opts,
+ }).catch((error) => {
+ const status = error.response?.status;
+ const message = error.response?.data?.message || error.message;
+ throw new Error(`Grain API request failed with ${status}: ${message}`);
+ });
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _makeRequest({ | |
| $ = this, path, ...opts | |
| }) { | |
| return axios($, { | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: this._headers(), | |
| ...opts, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| _makeRequest({ | |
| $ = this, path, ...opts | |
| }) { | |
| return axios($, { | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: this._headers(), | |
| ...opts, | |
| }).catch((error) => { | |
| const status = error.response?.status; | |
| const message = error.response?.data?.message || error.message; | |
| throw new Error(`Grain API request failed with ${status}: ${message}`); | |
| }); | |
| }, |
Resolves #14678.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores