Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor CI fixes #527

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

brownbaerchen
Copy link
Contributor

The features from Gusto that we use here work again with the most recent Firedrake, so I switched the pipeline to use the latest Firedrake docker container. (@jshipton)
Also, black had an update and required some reformatting...

@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ jobs:
user_firedrake_tests:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
container:
image: firedrakeproject/firedrake-vanilla:2025-01
image: firedrakeproject/firedrake-vanilla:latest
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is dangerous. You don't know what the next stage will bring.. can you pin the version to something?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

un-pinning the version is precisely the point of this PR. The Gusto pipeline runs on the latest Firedrake, so if we pin Firedrake but not Gusto, we might get into trouble. If we pin both, we make sure that the current state runs now, but people may not be able to install the current Firedrake outside of containers in the future.
I suggest we test on the latest Firedrake and revert to a specific version if something fails that we cannot fix easily.
What is your take @jshipton, you have more experience on being dependent on Firedrake ;)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with @brownbaerchen - that seems to be the sanest option

@pancetta pancetta merged commit c13d5a5 into Parallel-in-Time:master Feb 4, 2025
87 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants