Test: src/graphql/types/Venue/creator.ts #3151
Conversation
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@NishantSinghhhhh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new test suite for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Test as TestSuite
participant Resolver as resolveCreator
participant DB as Database
participant Logger as Logger
Test->>Resolver: Call resolveCreator(context, parent)
alt Unauthenticated or Missing ID
Resolver-->>Test: Throw unauthenticated error
else Unauthorized
Resolver-->>Test: Throw unauthorized_action error
else Creator ID is null
Resolver-->>Test: Return null
else Creator ID matches current user
Resolver-->>Test: Return current user
else Valid creator ID mismatch
Resolver->>DB: Fetch creator details
DB-->>Resolver: Return creator details
alt Creator not found
Resolver->>Logger: Log error
Resolver-->>Test: Throw unexpected error
else Creator found
Resolver-->>Test: Return creator details
end
end
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
test/graphql/types/Venue/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)test/routes/graphql/gql.tada.d.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/graphql/types/Venue/creator.test.ts
[error] 29-29: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 30-30: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 31-31: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/graphql/types/Venue/creator.test.ts (4)
7-40: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions.The type definitions and interfaces are well-organized and provide good type safety for the test suite.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 29-29: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 30-30: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 31-31: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
42-128: LGTM! Robust authentication and authorization implementation.The resolver properly implements authentication and authorization checks, handles edge cases, and follows security best practices.
130-167: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The test setup provides a comprehensive mock structure with proper initialization of test context and mock data.
169-378: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite provides excellent coverage of authentication, authorization, and edge cases. The tests are well-organized and use clear assertions.
test/routes/graphql/gql.tada.d.ts (1)
1-218: LGTM! Auto-generated GraphQL schema types.This auto-generated file provides proper type definitions for the GraphQL schema.
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@NishantSinghhhhh There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready. |
|
, @Cioppolo14 , I mean this is not the case I believe, because it is assigned to me |
|
@palisadoes , can you please open this PR again, as I need to pass the tests so that I can merge it today itself |
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Venue/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Validate CodeRabbit Approval
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/graphql/types/Venue/creator.test.ts (6)
8-42: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions.The type definitions are clear, well-organized, and follow TypeScript best practices.
50-54: Add descriptive error messages for better debugging.The error messages could be more descriptive to help with debugging.
throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", + message: "User must be authenticated to access venue creator", }, });Also applies to: 73-77, 88-92, 104-108, 121-125
100-100: Implement type guards for safer type casting.The double cast (
as unknown as typeof User) bypasses TypeScript's type checking. Consider implementing type guards to ensure runtime type safety.#!/bin/bash # Search for User type definition ast-grep --pattern 'type User = { $$$ }'Also applies to: 128-128
131-182: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The test setup is comprehensive, with properly typed mock objects and follows testing best practices.
202-218: Remove duplicate test case.This test case is identical to the previous test for unauthenticated users (lines 184-200).
- it("should throw unauthenticated error if user is not logged in", async () => { - const testCtx = { - ...ctx, - currentClient: { - isAuthenticated: false, - user: undefined, - }, - } as unknown as ResolverContext; - - await expect(async () => { - await resolveCreator(mockVenue, {}, testCtx); - }).rejects.toThrow( - new TalawaGraphQLError({ - extensions: { code: "unauthenticated" }, - }), - ); - });
184-394: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite thoroughly covers various scenarios including:
- Authentication checks
- Authorization rules
- Edge cases
- Error handling
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
|
@palisadoes , I have added all the tests for this component , can you tell me what more changes do I need to make so that I can make this PR mergeable |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Venue/creator.test.ts (3)
98-98:⚠️ Potential issueAdd runtime type validation before type casting.
The type casting to
typeof Useris unsafe without runtime validation. Consider adding type guards.Also applies to: 126-127
48-52: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Add descriptive error messages for better debugging.
The error messages should be more descriptive to help with debugging.
Also applies to: 71-75, 86-90, 102-106, 119-123
200-216:⚠️ Potential issueRemove duplicate test case.
This test case is a duplicate of the previous test for unauthenticated users (lines 182-198).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Venue/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3151 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 39.71% 39.71%
=================================================
Files 455 455
Lines 33553 33553
Branches 407 407
=================================================
Hits 13324 13324
Misses 20229 20229 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@palisadoes , I am done adding tests in this PR , so do tell me the changes that are required to make it merge in the branch |
palisadoes
merged commit 20d7f4b
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Test Implementation and Code Quality Enhancement
Issue Number:
Fixes #3076
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A - Test implementation
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No documentation update required as this is a test implementation.
Summary
This PR implements comprehensive test coverage for the Venue Creator resolver in the GraphQL API. The changes include:
Key testing areas include:
The test suite ensures robust functionality of the venue creator resolver while maintaining high code quality standards.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
anytypesTest Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit