Create AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx #3769
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new test file for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant M as AgendaCategoryPreviewModal
participant C as Callback Handlers
U->>M: Open modal (prop true)
M-->>U: Render category name, description, creator's name
U->>M: Click Close Button
M->>C: Call hidePreviewModal()
U->>M: Click Edit Button
M->>C: Call showUpdateModal()
M->>C: Call hidePreviewModal()
U->>M: Click Delete Button
M->>C: Call toggleDeleteModal()
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@Cioppolo14 please review my PR. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx (3)
1-8: Good implementation of mocks and imports.The imports and test setup are well-structured, providing the necessary dependencies for testing the component.
However, the mock translation function should have an explicit return type to comply with TypeScript best practices:
- const mockT = (key: string) => key; + const mockT = (key: string): string => key;🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 7-7: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
9-18: Well-structured test suite setup with proper mock cleanup.The test suite is properly set up with all the necessary mocks and cleanup pattern, which ensures test isolation.
Consider improving the mock object formatting according to the project's style guidelines:
- const mockCategory = { name: 'Meeting', description: 'Team discussion', createdBy: 'John Doe' }; + const mockCategory = { + name: 'Meeting', + description: 'Team discussion', + createdBy: 'John Doe', + };🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 13-13: Replace
·name:·'Meeting',·description:·'Team·discussion',·createdBy:·'John·Doe'with⏎····name:·'Meeting',⏎····description:·'Team·discussion',⏎····createdBy:·'John·Doe',⏎·(prettier/prettier)
105-122: Thorough test for delete button functionality.The test properly verifies that the delete action is triggered when the delete button is clicked.
Consider adding a test for keyboard accessibility (e.g., pressing Escape to close the modal) to ensure the component is fully accessible.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx
[error] 7-7: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
[error] 13-13: Replace ·name:·'Meeting',·description:·'Team·discussion',·createdBy:·'John·Doe' with ⏎····name:·'Meeting',⏎····description:·'Team·discussion',⏎····createdBy:·'John·Doe',⏎·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 63-63: Replace 'previewAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn' with ⏎······'previewAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn',⏎····
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx (5)
19-35: Good test for modal rendering when open.This test effectively verifies that all required content is displayed when the modal is open.
36-50: Appropriate test for modal non-rendering.This test correctly uses
queryByTextinstead ofgetByTextto check for the absence of elements, which is the proper approach when verifying that elements are not in the DOM.
51-68: Effective test for close button functionality.This test properly verifies the interaction with the close button and confirms that the appropriate callback is invoked.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 63-63: Replace
'previewAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn'with⏎······'previewAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn',⏎····(prettier/prettier)
69-85: Good edge case handling for empty values.The test effectively verifies that the component handles empty form state values correctly, ensuring robustness in different scenarios.
86-104: Well-implemented test for edit button functionality.This test correctly verifies that clicking the edit button both opens the update modal and closes the preview modal, ensuring proper modal state transitions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx (1)
75-90: Consider adding more specific assertions for empty state display.The test verifies that labels are displayed when form values are empty, but it might be beneficial to also verify how empty values are rendered to users.
Consider extending this test to verify what exactly is displayed in place of empty values (e.g., checking for placeholder text, empty strings, or "N/A" indicators if those are part of the component's behavior).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx
[error] 7-7: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx
[failure] 7-7:
Missing return type on function
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx
[error] 7-7: Missing return type on function @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/Preview/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsx (1)
9-128: Well-structured comprehensive test suite.The test coverage is excellent, covering all key functionality of the component:
- Modal rendering based on open state
- Close, edit, and delete button interactions
- Rendering with both populated and empty form values
The tests are well-organized with clear descriptions and proper cleanup between tests using
afterEach.
| import AgendaCategoryPreviewModal from './AgendaCategoryPreviewModal'; | ||
|
|
||
| // Mock translation function | ||
| const mockT = (key: string) => key; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add explicit return type for the mockT function to fix lint error.
The linter is reporting a missing return type on the mock translation function, which is causing the pipeline failure.
-const mockT = (key: string) => key;
+const mockT = (key: string): string => key;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const mockT = (key: string) => key; | |
| const mockT = (key: string): string => key; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 7-7: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[failure] 7-7:
Missing return type on function
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] 7-7: Missing return type on function @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type
Sujal942
force-pushed
the
develop-postgres
branch
from
4f29acf to
6170d7f
Compare
|
Hey @noman2002 Seems like I mistakenly pushed the commit in the branch naming same as the target which leads to check failing, I have raised another PR with different branch name, would you mind reviewing it #3780 Thanks |
Pull Request Title:
✅ Written Unit Tests for
AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx| 100% Code CoverageDescription:
This PR adds unit tests for the
AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsxcomponent, ensuring 100% code coverage. The tests cover rendering behavior, state changes, and event handling.Issue Reference:
Fixes #3688
Changes Introduced:
AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.test.tsxTest Coverage Results:
✅ Statements: 100% (4/4)
✅ Branches: 100% (0/0)
✅ Functions: 100% (2/2)
✅ Lines: 100% (4/4)
Snapshots/Videos:
Checklist:
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Breaking Changes?
No breaking changes introduced.
Other Information:
This PR ensures the component is fully tested and maintains high code quality. Please review and provide feedback! 🚀
Summary by CodeRabbit