#3736 issue: updated #3768
#3736 issue: updated #3768
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request makes several login-related updates. It revises the translation texts by updating and adding keys in the locales file. New routes for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant R as Router
participant L as LoginPage
U->>R: Navigate to "/" or "/register" or "/admin"
R->>L: Render LoginPage component based on route
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
public/locales/en/translation.json(1 hunks)src/App.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/App.tsx
[error] 142-143: Expected a JSX attribute but instead found '======='.
Expected a JSX attribute here.
(parse)
[error] 144-144: expected > but instead found <
Remove <
(parse)
[error] 142-143: Expected corresponding JSX closing tag for 'Updated'.
Opening tag
closing tag
(parse)
[error] 145-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
src/style/app.module.css
[error] 969-970: Unexpected value or character.
Expected one of:
(parse)
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/App.tsx
[error] 1-1: Unauthorized change/delete detected for file 'src/App.tsx'. To override this, apply the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
public/locales/en/translation.json (1)
69-70: Clarify Login Translations.
The updated"userLogin"value from"User Login"to"Login", along with the addition of"adminLogin": "Admin Login", clearly differentiates between user and admin logins. Please ensure that all components (e.g., the LoginPage and routing logic) reference these updated keys consistently.src/App.tsx (2)
144-144: Verify the need for multiple routes rendering the same componentThe application already has a route at path "/" that renders the LoginPage component. Now you're adding two more routes ("/register" and "/admin") that render the same component. This could cause confusion for users unless LoginPage has internal logic to display different content based on the route.
Does the LoginPage component have conditional rendering that responds differently to these different routes? If not, consider updating the component or creating separate components for these routes.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 144-144: expected
>but instead found<Remove <
(parse)
142-146:❓ Verification inconclusive
Pipeline indicates this is a sensitive file
The pipeline failure indicates that changes to this file require special permission. You may need to apply the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to this PR if these changes are intentional.
🌐 Web query:
What is the purpose of using ignore-sensitive-files-pr label in GitHub PRs?💡 Result:
The "ignore-sensitive-files-pr" label in GitHub pull requests is a custom label used by development teams to flag changes that require special attention to ensure sensitive files (e.g., credentials, API keys, or personal data) are excluded from commits. While not explicitly defined in GitHub’s official documentation, this practice aligns with broader strategies for managing security risks in repositories[6][7][10].
Key Purposes of the Label:
Security Awareness:
It prompts reviewers to verify that sensitive files likesecrets.json,.env, orconfig.ymlare not inadvertently included in the PR. Such files should typically be ignored via.gitignore[1][4] or managed through environment variables/secrets[6].Workflow Efficiency:
Teams often use labels like this to streamline code reviews by categorizing PRs that touch sensitive paths (e.g.,/scripts/**or*.cfg)[5][9]. For example:
- A PR modifying authentication logic might use this label to remind reviewers to check for hardcoded credentials.
- It could also signal that automated tools like
git-secretsorgitleaksshould scan the changes[10].Compliance and Auditing:
In regulated environments, this label helps document that sensitive data handling was reviewed, supporting audit trails[6][9].Implementation Tips:
- Combine the label with automated checks (e.g., GitHub Actions) to block PRs containing patterns like
password=*orAPI_KEY=*[6].- Use CODEOWNERS to require reviews from security leads for PRs with this label[6].
- Reference
.gitignoretemplates (e.g., from github/gitignore) to standardize ignored file patterns[4][10].Example Workflow:
1. Developer opens a PR modifying `/src/auth/config.yaml`. 2. Adds the `ignore-sensitive-files-pr` label. 3. Automated scan checks for sensitive patterns and flags if detected. 4. Reviewer verifies no secrets are exposed and `.gitignore` rules are followed[1][7].While GitHub doesn’t natively enforce file exclusions via labels, tools like Graphite’s PR inbox[9] or gitStream[3] can enhance this process by integrating label-based filtering with automated file-ignoring rules.
Citations:
- 1: https://git-is-my-lab-book.net/guides/using-git/how-to-ignore-certain-files/
- 2: https://www.cbtnuggets.com/blog/technology/programming/how-to-use-the-gitignore-file
- 3: https://docs.gitstream.cm/how-it-works/
- 4: https://docs.github.com/articles/ignoring-files
- 5: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/managing-copilot/configuring-and-auditing-content-exclusion/excluding-content-from-github-copilot
- 6: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-for-github-actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions
- 7: https://graphite.dev/guides/how-to-delete-sensitive-data-from-git
- 8: https://intellij-support.jetbrains.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/14205262072594-Is-it-possible-to-ignore-certain-files-from-a-pull-request-change-list-based-on-a-some-condition
- 9: https://graphite.dev/guides/guide-to-github-pr-labels
- 10: https://github.com/groda/the_ultimate_gitignore_guide
Attention: Sensitive File Change Detected
The pipeline flagged changes in
src/App.tsx(lines 142–146) as touching a sensitive file. The conflict resolution snippet—where routes for/registerand/admin(both routed to<LoginPage />) were updated—suggests that these modifications will trigger extra security checks.
- File:
src/App.tsx(lines 142–146)- Issue: The pipeline indicates that modifications in this sensitive file require special handling.
- Action: If these changes are intentional, please apply the
ignore-sensitive-files-prlabel. This label is used to mark PRs that modify files requiring additional security and auditing measures, ensuring reviewers verify sensitive content is handled appropriately.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 142-143: Expected a JSX attribute but instead found '======='.
Expected a JSX attribute here.
(parse)
[error] 144-144: expected
>but instead found<Remove <
(parse)
[error] 142-143: Expected corresponding JSX closing tag for 'Updated'.
Opening tag
closing tag
(parse)
[error] 145-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean
{'>'}or>?(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean
{'>'}or>?(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean
{'>'}or>?(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean
{'>'}or>?(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean
{'>'}or>?(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean
{'>'}or>?(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean
{'>'}or>?(parse)
| .form-control:focus{ | ||
| box-shadow: (0 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Critical Syntax Issue in .form-control:focus Rule
The box-shadow property value is incorrectly enclosed in parentheses. In CSS, the value should be written without extra parentheses. Please update this block accordingly.
-.form-control:focus{
- box-shadow: (0 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15));
-}
+.form-control:focus {
+ box-shadow: 0 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15);
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .form-control:focus{ | |
| box-shadow: (0 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15)); | |
| } | |
| .form-control:focus { | |
| box-shadow: 0 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 969-970: Unexpected value or character.
Expected one of:
(parse)
| <<<<<<< Updated upstream | ||
| ======= | ||
| <Route path="/register" element={<LoginPage />} /><Route path="/admin" element={<LoginPage />} /> | ||
|
|
||
| >>>>>>> Stashed changes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove merge conflict markers and fix route formatting
There are unresolved merge conflict markers in the code that need to be removed. This would cause the application to break if deployed. Additionally, both new routes should be properly formatted on separate lines for readability.
Apply this diff to resolve the merge conflicts and properly format the routes:
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
- <Route path="/register" element={<LoginPage />} /><Route path="/admin" element={<LoginPage />} />
-
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
+ <Route path="/register" element={<LoginPage />} />
+ <Route path="/admin" element={<LoginPage />} />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <<<<<<< Updated upstream | |
| ======= | |
| <Route path="/register" element={<LoginPage />} /><Route path="/admin" element={<LoginPage />} /> | |
| >>>>>>> Stashed changes | |
| <Route path="/register" element={<LoginPage />} /> | |
| <Route path="/admin" element={<LoginPage />} /> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 142-143: Expected a JSX attribute but instead found '======='.
Expected a JSX attribute here.
(parse)
[error] 144-144: expected > but instead found <
Remove <
(parse)
[error] 142-143: Expected corresponding JSX closing tag for 'Updated'.
Opening tag
closing tag
(parse)
[error] 145-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
[error] 146-146: Unexpected token. Did you mean {'>'} or >?
(parse)
|
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready. |
|
Okey!
…On Sat, Mar 1, 2025, 22:13 Peter Harrison ***@***.***> wrote:
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the
guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so
that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this
pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3768 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BE2IWKL2LWMP5O4KJ6AP7E32SHPRZAVCNFSM6AAAAABYEBJ462VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOJSGMYTENJWGM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
[image: palisadoes]*palisadoes* left a comment
(PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3768)
<#3768 (comment)>
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the
guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so
that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this
pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3768 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BE2IWKL2LWMP5O4KJ6AP7E32SHPRZAVCNFSM6AAAAABYEBJ462VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOJSGMYTENJWGM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Actually this was my first contribution. So, mistake happened
…On Sat, Mar 1, 2025, 22:15 Vishal Gaikwad ***@***.***> wrote:
Okey!
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025, 22:13 Peter Harrison ***@***.***>
wrote:
> There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the
> guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so
> that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this
> pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#3768 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BE2IWKL2LWMP5O4KJ6AP7E32SHPRZAVCNFSM6AAAAABYEBJ462VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOJSGMYTENJWGM>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
> [image: palisadoes]*palisadoes* left a comment
> (PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3768)
> <#3768 (comment)>
>
> There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the
> guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so
> that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this
> pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#3768 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BE2IWKL2LWMP5O4KJ6AP7E32SHPRZAVCNFSM6AAAAABYEBJ462VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOJSGMYTENJWGM>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
|
I will work on my mistake
…On Sat, Mar 1, 2025, 22:23 Vishal Gaikwad ***@***.***> wrote:
Actually this was my first contribution. So, mistake happened
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025, 22:15 Vishal Gaikwad ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Okey!
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2025, 22:13 Peter Harrison ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
>> There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the
>> guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so
>> that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this
>> pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.
>>
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <#3768 (comment)>,
>> or unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BE2IWKL2LWMP5O4KJ6AP7E32SHPRZAVCNFSM6AAAAABYEBJ462VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOJSGMYTENJWGM>
>> .
>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>> ***@***.***>
>> [image: palisadoes]*palisadoes* left a comment
>> (PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3768)
>> <#3768 (comment)>
>>
>> There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the
>> guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so
>> that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this
>> pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.
>>
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <#3768 (comment)>,
>> or unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BE2IWKL2LWMP5O4KJ6AP7E32SHPRZAVCNFSM6AAAAABYEBJ462VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOJSGMYTENJWGM>
>> .
>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>> ***@***.***>
>>
>
|
|
Please watch this playlist. It is mentioned as a pinned post in the #general slack channel and we reference it in all our slack welcome messages |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit