Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated @mui/x-date-pickers from 7.12.1 to 7.18.0 #2299

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

akshayw1
Copy link

@akshayw1 akshayw1 commented Sep 26, 2024

PR Title:

chore(deps): Upgrade @mui/x-date-pickers from 7.12.1 to 7.18.0


What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Major revision upgrade of the @mui/x-date-pickers package. This will update the dependency from version 7.12.1 to 7.18.0, addressing potential compatibility and security issues.


Issue Number:

Fixes #2292


Did you add tests for your changes?

NA

Snapshots/Videos:

N/A


If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No documentation updates were required.


Summary:

This PR upgrades the @mui/x-date-pickers package from version 7.12.1 to 7.18.0. The previous Dependabot automated update (PR #2292) encountered test failures, likely due to multiple dependency or syntax changes introduced in the newer version. This PR handles the upgrade by addressing all compatibility issues, updating relevant files with new syntax, methods, or class usages.

The following steps were taken:

  • Updated dependencies and fixed issues in the relevant files.
  • Removed any unused or unnecessary components from the package if no longer needed.
  • Verified functionality to ensure that there is no breaking change or impact on user-facing features.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No breaking changes identified. However, since this is a major version update, thorough testing has been done to ensure stability.


Other information:

  • If any feature used by this package is not essential for the end user, it was either optimized or replaced with an existing solution in the repository.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new dependencies to enhance the Material-UI library experience, including @mui/base and @mui/utils.
  • Improvements

    • Updated existing dependency @mui/x-date-pickers to the latest version for improved functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updates to the package.json file, specifically modifying dependencies related to the Material-UI library. New dependencies @mui/base and @mui/utils have been added, while the existing dependency @mui/x-date-pickers has been upgraded to a newer version. Additionally, a new dependency @mui/x-internals has been introduced. These changes aim to enhance the project's dependency management and ensure compatibility with the latest library features.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Added dependencies: @mui/base (v^5.0.0-beta.56), @mui/utils (v^5.16.6); Updated @mui/x-date-pickers from v^7.11.1 to v^7.18.0; Added @mui/x-internals (v^7.18.0).

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Upgrade the @mui/x-date-pickers package from version 7.12.1 to 7.18.0 (#[2292])

Possibly related issues

  • None identified as related to the objectives of this PR.

Possibly related PRs

  • eslint-plugin-jest upgraded #2261: This PR updates dependencies in the package.json file, similar to the main PR, which also involves modifications to the package.json for dependency management.

Poem

In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With @mui updates brightening our day.
New tools in our basket, so fresh and so fine,
Let's code with joy, and let our work shine!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 959399d and e06b0e8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
package.json (5)

23-23: Approved: @mui/x-date-pickers upgrade.

The upgrade of @mui/x-date-pickers to version ^7.18.0 aligns with the PR objectives. This change is approved.

Reminder: Ensure that all features using date pickers have been thoroughly tested with this new version to catch any potential breaking changes or unexpected behaviors.


15-24: Summary of dependency changes and testing recommendations.

The main objective of upgrading @mui/x-date-pickers to version 7.18.0 has been achieved. However, there are additional changes that require attention:

  1. New dependencies: @mui/base, @mui/utils, and @mui/x-internals have been added.
  2. The versions of these new dependencies seem to be aligned with the @mui/x-date-pickers upgrade.

Given these changes, it's crucial to:

  1. Verify the necessity of each new dependency as requested in the individual comments.
  2. Conduct thorough testing of all features that use date pickers or any MUI components to ensure no regressions or unexpected behaviors.
  3. Review the application's performance to confirm that these additional dependencies don't negatively impact load times or runtime performance.

To ensure all new dependencies are properly declared and used, run:

npm ls @mui/base @mui/utils @mui/x-date-pickers @mui/x-internals

This will show the dependency tree and help verify that all packages are correctly installed and don't have version conflicts.


20-20: Verify the necessity of @mui/utils dependency.

A new dependency @mui/utils@^5.16.6 has been added. While this wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives, it might be a new peer dependency required by the updated @mui/x-date-pickers. Please confirm if this dependency is necessary for the @mui/x-date-pickers upgrade.

To check if this is a peer dependency, run:

npm info @mui/[email protected] peerDependencies

15-15: Verify the necessity of @mui/base dependency.

A new dependency @mui/base@^5.0.0-beta.56 has been added. While this wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives, it might be a new peer dependency required by the updated @mui/x-date-pickers. However, please confirm the following:

  1. Is this dependency necessary for the @mui/x-date-pickers upgrade?
  2. Are there any implications of using a beta version in production?

To check if this is a peer dependency, run:


24-24: Verify the necessity and impact of @mui/x-internals dependency.

A new dependency @mui/x-internals@^7.18.0 has been added. This wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives. Please address the following:

  1. Is this dependency necessary for the @mui/x-date-pickers upgrade?
  2. What is the purpose of this package, and how does it affect our project?
  3. Are there any potential risks or impacts on the project's stability or performance?

To check if this is a peer dependency and get more information, run:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

@akshayw1 akshayw1 closed this Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant