Configure Automatic Labeling for Issues

[Sumitsh28]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Feature: Configures automatic labeling for issues.

Issue Number: 2256

Did you add tests for your changes?

No. This change is related to GitHub Actions configuration and does not require unit tests.

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No, documentation update is not required for this change.

Summary

This pull request updates the issue.yml file to configure automatic labeling of issues using the Renato66/auto-label GitHub action. The motivation behind this change is to reduce manual labeling effort and ensure that issues are labeled consistently based on their content. This automation will improve the efficiency of issue management by applying appropriate labels for dependencies, security, and design-related issues.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this PR does not introduce any breaking changes.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced detailed label configurations for categorizing issues (e.g., "dependencies," "security," "ui/ux").

• Improvements

  • Enhanced organization and categorization of incoming issues through granular labeling.
  • Reformatted the greeting message for new issues for consistency.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes made to the .github/workflows/issue.yml file include the addition of new label configurations for issues and a minor reformatting of the types field under the issues trigger. The most notable update is the introduction of a detailed labels configuration in the Opened-issue-label job, which categorizes issues into various labels such as "dependencies," "security," and "ui/ux." These modifications enhance the organization of incoming issues while maintaining the existing workflow logic.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/issue.yml	Added labels configuration in job Opened-issue-label; reformatted types field for consistency.

Possibly related issues

• ADMIN: Automatic Labeling for Dependencies, Security and Design Related Issues #2256: This issue requests automatic labeling for dependencies, security, and design-related issues, which aligns with the new label configurations introduced in this PR.

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, labels bloom bright,
Organizing issues, a wondrous sight.
With dependencies and security in play,
Our workflow's enhanced, hip-hip-hooray!
So hop along, let the labels sing,
For clarity and order, this change will bring! 🌼

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01ef5c6 and 0a73b3e.

Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/issue.yml (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (3)

.github/workflows/issue.yml (3)

15-16: LGTM!

The formatting change improves readability and consistency without affecting functionality.

---

27-31: Excellent addition of the label configuration!

The detailed labels configuration in the Opened-issue-label job is a valuable enhancement to the workflow. It allows for more granular labeling of issues based on their categories, such as dependencies, security, and UI/UX. This improvement will greatly facilitate the organization and categorization of incoming issues.

The configuration syntax is correct and follows the expected format. Moreover, this change does not introduce any breaking changes or negatively impact existing functionality.

Great work on implementing this feature!

---

39-39: LGTM!

The reformatting of the greeting message improves readability and consistency without altering its content or functionality.

Warning

Review ran into problems

Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[Cioppolo14]

@Sumitsh28 Please fix the failed checks

[Sumitsh28]

@Cioppolo14

The failed checks are:

1. Unauthorised File changed (issue.yml), for the issue 2256 i have to change the issue.yml file
2. Source branch is develop and target branch is also develop (its saying branches should be different)

How to fix these. Please help

[varshith257]

Source branch is develop and target branch is also develop (its saying branches should be different)

For this, you need to create a new local branch and push changes with upstream develop

[palisadoes]

@Sumitsh28 Have you tested this on a repository in your GitHub account to make sure it works?

[Sumitsh28]

@palisadoes Yes, I have tested this

[palisadoes]

1. This PR needs to be closed. The source and target PR branches are the same. This means that our reviewers will not be able to checkout the changes and test on their systems using this methodology which will cause a rejection error:
   1. https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
2. Please create a new branch in your local repository with the changes
3. Make sure the branch name is named differently from the target branch (develop)
4. Resubmit your PR

You will see that other PRs are using non-develop branch names for this reason