Skip to content

[17.0][MIG] account_invoice_payment_retention: Migration to 17.0 #2034

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 30 commits into
base: 17.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SidroVL
Copy link

@SidroVL SidroVL commented Jun 25, 2025

No description provided.

kittiu and others added 30 commits June 25, 2025 11:30
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: account-invoicing-14.0/account-invoicing-14.0-account_invoice_payment_retention
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/account-invoicing-14-0/account-invoicing-14-0-account_invoice_payment_retention/
Currently translated at 100.0% (40 of 40 strings)

Translation: account-invoicing-16.0/account-invoicing-16.0-account_invoice_payment_retention
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/account-invoicing-16-0/account-invoicing-16-0-account_invoice_payment_retention/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (40 of 40 strings)

Translation: account-invoicing-16.0/account-invoicing-16.0-account_invoice_payment_retention
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/account-invoicing-16-0/account-invoicing-16-0-account_invoice_payment_retention/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (40 of 40 strings)

Translation: account-invoicing-16.0/account-invoicing-16.0-account_invoice_payment_retention
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/account-invoicing-16-0/account-invoicing-16-0-account_invoice_payment_retention/it/
@SidroVL SidroVL mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2025
50 tasks
@SidroVL
Copy link
Author

SidroVL commented Jun 25, 2025

In the form view of the wizard (view_account_payment_register_form), in the “apply_payment_retention” field, the widget="boolean_toggle" option has been removed because it causes problems and the value of the field had to be changed several times to have the desired effect.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.