Skip to content

Add cuBLASMp-backed GEMM-like API to TE common #1824

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 47 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mk-61
Copy link
Collaborator

@mk-61 mk-61 commented May 27, 2025

Description

This change adds to TE common an API for distributed GEMMs, implemented by cuBLASMp.
Functionality should be similar to the existing comm_gemm_overlap implementation, which is bases on UserBuffers.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Documentation change (change only to the documentation, either a fix or a new content)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Infra/Build change
  • Code refactoring

Changes

Please list the changes introduced in this PR:

  • A new API added

Checklist:

  • I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
  • The functionality is complete
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@mk-61
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mk-61 commented Jun 2, 2025

/te-ci pytorch

@mk-61
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mk-61 commented Jun 3, 2025

/te-ci core L0

@mk-61
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mk-61 commented Jun 3, 2025

/te-ci

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants