Skip to content

Conversation

@chesterxgchen
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes # .
Fix documentation issues in Cyclic and Logistics Regression

A few sentences describing the changes proposed in this pull request.

Types of changes

  • Non-breaking change (fix or new feature that would not break existing functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or new feature that would cause existing functionality to change).
  • New tests added to cover the changes.
  • Quick tests passed locally by running ./runtest.sh.
  • In-line docstrings updated.
  • Documentation updated.

@chesterxgchen chesterxgchen changed the title Fix documentation issues in Cyclic and Logistics Regression Fix documentation issues in Cyclic and Logistics Regression [skip ci] Sep 9, 2025
@chesterxgchen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/build

Copy link
Collaborator

@nvkevlu nvkevlu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@chesterxgchen chesterxgchen merged commit 48b637b into NVIDIA:main Sep 9, 2025
20 checks passed
chesterxgchen added a commit to chesterxgchen/NVFlare that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2025
…NVIDIA#3670)

Fixes # .
Fix documentation issues in Cyclic and Logistics Regression


A few sentences describing the changes proposed in this pull request.

### Types of changes
<!--- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply, and remove the not
applicable items -->
- [x] Non-breaking change (fix or new feature that would not break
existing functionality).
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or new feature that would cause existing
functionality to change).
- [ ] New tests added to cover the changes.
- [ ] Quick tests passed locally by running `./runtest.sh`.
- [ ] In-line docstrings updated.
- [ ] Documentation updated.
@chesterxgchen chesterxgchen deleted the documentation_2 branch October 19, 2025 03:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants