Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix typo #9155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

fix typo #9155

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

ttytm
Copy link
Contributor

@ttytm ttytm commented May 18, 2024

Description

Please write a few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.

PR checklist

Please tick as appropriate and edit the reasons (e.g.: "backport: not needed because this is a new feature")

  • changelog not required
  • 3.6 backport done, or not required
  • 2.28 backport not required (Testing code is not present in LTS)
  • tests not required

Notes for the submitter

Please refer to the contributing guidelines, especially the
checklist for PR contributors.

Help make review efficient:

  • Multiple simple commits
    • please structure your PR into a series of small commits, each of which does one thing
  • Avoid force-push
    • please do not force-push to update your PR - just add new commit(s)
  • See our Guidelines for Contributors for more details about the review process.

Signed-off-by: Turiiya <[email protected]>
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ def __str__(self):
{translation_table}
}};

return "UNKOWN";
return "UNKNOWN";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

47854e6 reverted return "UNKOWN_VAULE"; to the return with the oopsi.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes, but for "UNKOWN" we only fixed one of two instances in the file back in #5732 - there is so much duplicated template around this line that it wasn't obvious to me yesterday evening

@minosgalanakis minosgalanakis added component-test Test framework and CI scripts priority-low Low priority - this may not receive review soon size-xs Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most) labels May 23, 2024
@minosgalanakis minosgalanakis self-requested a review May 23, 2024 14:54
@minosgalanakis
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your contribution.

Could you please backport this PR against mbedtls-3.6 branch?

@ttytm ttytm mentioned this pull request May 23, 2024
4 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm added the needs-review Every commit must be reviewed by at least two team members, label May 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@minosgalanakis minosgalanakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm added approved Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports and removed needs-review Every commit must be reviewed by at least two team members, labels May 30, 2024
@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm added this pull request to the merge queue May 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into Mbed-TLS:development with commit d961929 May 31, 2024
6 checks passed
@ttytm ttytm deleted the fix-typo branch May 31, 2024 01:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports component-test Test framework and CI scripts priority-low Low priority - this may not receive review soon size-xs Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most)
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants