Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor readers x #252

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

Refactor readers x #252

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

mschwoer
Copy link
Contributor

@mschwoer mschwoer commented Nov 20, 2024

move more responsibility to psm_reader.yaml

also, changed the structure of psm_reader.yaml: all modification_mappings are now gathered under one key and referenced by readers.. let me know what you think!

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@mschwoer mschwoer marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2024 08:46
@@ -13,13 +13,8 @@ alphapept:
'raw_name': 'raw_name' #parse from `ms_data.hdf`` file
'fdr': 'q_value'
'decoy': 'decoy'
modification_mapping:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we shall show here that if search engines use unimod_id

Copy link
Collaborator

@jalew188 jalew188 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pFind-specific testing result is required

@mschwoer mschwoer requested a review from jalew188 December 20, 2024 16:21
Base automatically changed from refactor_readers_IX to development January 9, 2025 08:45
@mschwoer mschwoer merged commit 09bdfe6 into development Jan 9, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@mschwoer mschwoer deleted the refactor_readers_X branch January 9, 2025 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants