-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question about result of toy data. #103
Comments
Hello! I'm having the same questions, did you manage to find convincing answers? |
It is mainly because of small object with/without hole in the center is difficult to discriminate. If I remember well, if you make the inner hole bigger, the validation results would become better. You can have a try. Best, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, I'm a beginner of MedicalDetectionToolkit, this is a very amazing framework for medical object detection. Thanks for your contributions to community!
When using MDT on 2D toy data by implementing:
python experiments/toy_exp/generate_toys.py
numerical results is a little bit wrong: the trend of loss is not stable:
The visulization of 2D toydata shows it has many bbox candidates.(NMS not work?) I didn't change any parameters on config.py, do I forget or misuse some parameters of MDT?
Best,
Mengzhang LI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: