fix: pivot table date format

[islxyqwe]

fix the date show in pivot table

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
graphic-walker	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 9, 2024 8:51am

[github-actions]

Risk Level 2 - /home/runner/work/graphic-walker/graphic-walker/packages/graphic-walker/src/components/pivotTable/index.tsx

The code seems to be well written and follows SOLID principles. However, there are a few areas that could be improved for better readability and maintainability:

1. The useEffect hooks are quite large and complex. It would be beneficial to break down the logic inside these hooks into smaller, more manageable functions. This would make the code easier to understand and maintain.

2. The aggregateThenGenerate and generateNewTable functions are defined inside the component. It would be better to define these functions outside the component and pass in the necessary dependencies as arguments. This would make the component code cleaner and easier to read.

3. The aggregateGroupbyData function is quite large and complex. It would be beneficial to break down this function into smaller, more manageable functions. This would make the code easier to understand and maintain.

4. The aggregateGroupbyData function contains a lot of nested logic. It would be beneficial to flatten this logic to make the code easier to read and understand.

5. The aggregateGroupbyData function contains a lot of promise handling logic. It would be beneficial to use async/await syntax to make the code easier to read and understand.

---

Risk Level 2 - /home/runner/work/graphic-walker/graphic-walker/packages/graphic-walker/src/components/pivotTable/topTree.tsx

The code changes are generally good, but there are a few areas that could be improved for better readability and maintainability:

1. Use of Ternary Operator: The ternary operator is used multiple times in the code. While it's not a problem in itself, it can make the code harder to read when overused. Consider using if-else statements for complex conditions. For example:

let formatter;
if (field?.semanticType === 'temporal') {
  formatter = (x) => formatDate(parsedOffsetDate(displayOffset, field.offset)(x));
} else {
  formatter = (x) => `${x}`;
}

2. Use of Magic Strings: There are a few magic strings in the code (e.g., 'temporal', '__total'). It would be better to define these as constants at the top of the file or in a separate constants file. This makes the code easier to maintain and less prone to errors due to typos.

3. Use of Optional Chaining: The use of optional chaining (e.g., field?.semanticType) is good as it helps to prevent runtime errors. However, it's important to ensure that the code can handle undefined values gracefully.

4. React Component Keys: Ensure that the keys used for React components are unique across the entire list. Using an index as part of the key (e.g., ${depth}-${node.fieldKey}-${node.value}-${cellRows[depth].length}) can lead to issues if the order of elements changes.

5. Recursive Function Calls: The renderTree function is called recursively. This is fine for small data sets, but for large data sets, it could lead to a stack overflow. Consider using an iterative approach if the data set can be large.

---

Risk Level 2 - /home/runner/work/graphic-walker/graphic-walker/packages/graphic-walker/src/components/pivotTable/leftTree.tsx

The code seems to be well written and follows SOLID principles. However, there are a few areas that could be improved for better readability and maintainability:

1. The renderTree function is quite large and complex. It would be beneficial to break down this function into smaller, more manageable functions. This would make the code easier to understand and maintain.

2. The renderTree function contains a lot of nested logic. It would be beneficial to flatten this logic to make the code easier to read and understand.

3. The renderTree function contains a lot of conditional rendering logic. It would be beneficial to separate this logic into smaller, more manageable functions. This would make the code easier to understand and maintain.

4. The LeftTree component contains a lot of complex logic. It would be beneficial to break down this component into smaller, more manageable components. This would make the code easier to understand and maintain.

---

📚🔍🔄

---

Powered by Code Review GPT