Clarify ROOT::RNTupleModel Ownership #243
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
ROOT::RNTupleModel::Create()returns a unique_ptr. We have several instances of passing the unique_ptr by reference to methods which do not assume ownership. This obscures the ownership of the RNTupleModel.PR
This PR changes the signatures of methods from
void method(std::unique_ptr<ROOT::RNTupleModel> &ptr>tovoid method(ROOT::RNTupleModel *ptr>. This change does not affect the use of the RNTupleModel ptr inside the method.Comment
The changes were made using sed to edit the nearly-identical signatures in-place
grep Analysis/ Parity/ -e "& model" -nriI | awk -F ':' '{print $1}' | xargs sed -i 's/std::unique_ptr<ROOT::RNTupleModel>& model/ROOT::RNTupleModel *model/g'