-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-use device buffer in yuy2 cuda helper #11737
Open
attiladoor
wants to merge
1
commit into
IntelRealSense:development
Choose a base branch
from
attiladoor:development
base: development
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+64
−14
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -15,6 +15,54 @@ | |
|
||
namespace rscuda | ||
{ | ||
|
||
template <typename T> | ||
class DeviceBuffer final | ||
{ | ||
public: | ||
DeviceBuffer() = default; | ||
|
||
explicit DeviceBuffer(std::size_t const num_elements) : | ||
data_{DeviceBuffer<T>::allocateBuffer(num_elements)}, | ||
size_{num_elements} | ||
{} | ||
|
||
DeviceBuffer(std::size_t const num_elements, std::size_t const number_of_channels = 1U) : | ||
DeviceBuffer{num_elements * number_of_channels} | ||
{} | ||
|
||
void reserve(std::size_t const reserve_size) | ||
{ | ||
if (size_ < reserve_size) | ||
{ | ||
cudaFree(data_); | ||
data_ = DeviceBuffer<T>::allocateBuffer(reserve_size); | ||
size_ = reserve_size; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
void reserve(std::size_t const reserve_size, std::size_t const reserve_channels) | ||
{ | ||
reserve(reserve_size * reserve_channels); | ||
} | ||
|
||
std::size_t size() const { return size_; } | ||
|
||
T* data() { return data_; } | ||
|
||
private: | ||
static T* allocateBuffer(std::size_t const reserve_size) | ||
{ | ||
T* datatemp{nullptr}; | ||
cudaMalloc(&datatemp, reserve_size * sizeof(T)); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. maybe i can add an assert to the return value of cudaMalloc and cudaFree above. What do you think? |
||
return datatemp; | ||
} | ||
|
||
T* data_{}; | ||
// Size is in number of elements, not bytes. | ||
std::size_t size_{}; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
template<typename T> | ||
std::shared_ptr<T> alloc_dev(int elements) | ||
{ | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my opinion, this is unnecessary, but better to use async copy and use the same stream across the whole function and do a stream syncronization before we return from this function. By that we can avoid extra syncing, however the gain would be probably not very significant.
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-runtime-api/group__CUDART__MEMORY.html#group__CUDART__MEMORY_1g85073372f776b4c4d5f89f7124b7bf79