Skip to content

Issues: IHE/DEV.SDPi

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

88 Open 176 Closed
88 Open 176 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Add clarification that SDC core standards already do recommend a TLS version greater than 1.2 Comment NEW A submitted comment waiting to be reviewed and dispositioned
#423 opened Apr 4, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 2.1 Review
@JavierEspina
Unique Identification of SaMD Instances
#421 opened Apr 2, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 3.X Review
4
DIS/DAS/SAS Design Guidelines
#420 opened Apr 2, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 3.X Review
@PeterKranich
2
System Types Nomenclature
#419 opened Apr 2, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 3.X Review
@PeterKranich
2
Request/response timing when SDC provider is unable to handle request
#418 opened Apr 2, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 3.X Review
@PeterKranich @d-gregorczyk
2
Try-and-error procedure to find out supported operations when WSDL is not available
#417 opened Apr 2, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 3.X Review
@PeterKranich @d-gregorczyk
1
Containment tree traversal
#416 opened Apr 2, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 3.0 Review
@d-gregorczyk
1
Probably incorrect references / statements in 1:11.1. and 1:13.1
#413 opened Mar 28, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 2.1 Review
@ToddCooper
What is the expected behavior of a consumer and provider in a mixed managed/ad hoc mode?
#411 opened Mar 27, 2025 by hvamstel SDPi 2.X Review
@d-gregorczyk
DEV-23, 24, 46, 47 transactions are not clear enough about ad-hoc vs managed mode
#409 opened Mar 20, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 2.1 Review
@d-gregorczyk
SDPi Issue Management section is outdated and hence confusing
#408 opened Mar 19, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 2.1 Review
@ToddCooper @JavierEspina
1
Action items from the SDPi 2.0 Developers & Tester (Nov 2024)
#406 opened Mar 14, 2025 by d-gregorczyk SDPi 2.1 Review
@JavierEspina @d-gregorczyk
1
Description reports and operational state reports missing in transactions Volume 2 Volume 2 contents
#403 opened Mar 6, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 2.1 Review
@JavierEspina @d-gregorczyk
Wrong BICEPS section in 2:3.27.3 Referenced Standards
#400 opened Mar 4, 2025 by JavierEspina SDPi 2.1 Review
@JavierEspina
ToI: OID Management Codes Issues related to coded values, coding systems and translations Comment General Comment received outside of a normal review "period" Spec An proposal related to the content or organization of the specification Topic of Interest Signifies relationships to Topic of Interests
#398 opened Feb 28, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 3.0 Review
@ToddCooper @PeterKranich @JavierEspina
1
ToI: LLDP Support Spec An proposal related to the content or organization of the specification Topic of Interest Signifies relationships to Topic of Interests Volume 2 Volume 2 contents
#397 opened Feb 28, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 3.0 Review
@MartinKasp
2
Add SDPi-P Gateway Directionality Options
#396 opened Feb 25, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 2.1 Review
@ToddCooper
1
ToI: Remote Maintenance Topic of Interest Signifies relationships to Topic of Interests
#394 opened Feb 21, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 3.0 Review
@kenjfuchs
1
ToI: Provider Initiated with Intermittent Connections Topic of Interest Signifies relationships to Topic of Interests
#393 opened Feb 21, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 3.0 Review
Limit options how provider can define the Display Precision
#392 opened Feb 19, 2025 by PeterKranich SDPi 2.X Review
@PeterKranich
1
Referenced Standards in 2:A section require clarification
#390 opened Feb 17, 2025 by omargar65 SDPi 2.1 Review
@d-gregorczyk
Add FHIR Gateway to the SDPi-R Actors table Comment Review Comment of some sort from somewhere sometime
#388 opened Feb 14, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 2.1 Review
@ToddCooper
Profile Required Actor Groupings - Update with Table Comment Review Comment of some sort from somewhere sometime
#387 opened Feb 14, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 2.1 Review
@ToddCooper
ToI: Computable IFU MDIB Extension for Network R-T Health Management Comment Review Comment of some sort from somewhere sometime
#386 opened Feb 14, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 3.0 Review
@ToddCooper
ToI - "Enhanced Discovery" SDPi-P Profile Option Comment Review Comment of some sort from somewhere sometime
#385 opened Feb 14, 2025 by ToddCooper SDPi 2.X Review
@kenjfuchs
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.