mamp@6 6.9 (new cask)

[WilliamIsted]

With MAMP Pro 7 being a paid for update, support should be kept for MAMP Pro 6.

Ref: 7481fac

Important: Do not tick a checkbox if you haven’t performed its action. Honesty is indispensable for a smooth review process.

In the following questions <cask> is the token of the cask you're submitting.

After making any changes to a cask, existing or new, verify:

• The submission is for a stable version or documented exception.
• brew audit --cask --online <cask> is error-free.
• brew style --fix <cask> reports no offenses.

Additionally, if adding a new cask:

• Named the cask according to the token reference.
• Checked the cask was not already refused (add your cask's name to the end of the search field).
• brew audit --cask --new <cask> worked successfully.
• HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --cask <cask> worked successfully.
• brew uninstall --cask <cask> worked successfully.

---

[SMillerDev]

Will upstream keep supporting this version?

[WilliamIsted]

Will upstream keep supporting this version?

I have reached out to the author to clarify if MAMP 6 will continue to be supported with updates / security patches. I'll update this PR once I have a reply.

Aside: MAMP 7 moves to a subscription model with updates being limited by an active subscription so the latest version of 7 will only be usable for active subscribers unlike 6. It would be useful to keep 6 for existing users who don't want to move to a subscription model.

[bevanjkay]

Suggested change

	arch arm: "M1-arm", intel: "Intel-x86"
	arch arm: "Apple-chip", intel: "Intel-x86"

[bevanjkay]

Suggested change

	regex(%r{href=.*?/MAMP[._-]MAMP[._-]PRO[._-]v?(\d+(?:\.\d+)+)[._-]#{arch}\.pkg}i)
	regex(%r{href=.*?/MAMP[._-]MAMP[._-]PRO[._-]v?(#{version.major}(?:\.\d+)+)[._-]#{arch}\.pkg}i)

[p-linnane]

Closing due to lack of response.

[t-fritsch]

I have reached out to the author to clarify if MAMP 6 will continue to be supported with updates / security patches. I'll update this PR once I have a reply.

hello @WilliamIsted ! did mamp team reply ?