fix(2191): Migrate from ezsp to ember driver for Z2M

[cicoub13]

Pull Request check-list

To ensure your Pull Request can be accepted as fast as possible, make sure to review and check all of these items:

• If your changes affects code, did your write the tests?
• Are tests passing? (npm test on both front/server)
• Is the linter passing? (npm run eslint on both front/server)
• Did you run prettier? (npm run prettier on both front/server)
• If you are adding a new features/services, did you run integration comparator? (npm run compare-translations on front)
• Did you test this pull request in real life? With real devices? If this development is a big feature or a new service, we recommend that you provide a Docker image to the community (french forum/english forum) for testing before merging.
• If your changes modify the API (REST or Node.js), did you modify the API documentation? (Documentation is based on comments in code)
• If you are adding a new features/services which needs explanation, did you modify the user documentation? See the GitHub repo and the website.
• Did you add fake requests data for the demo mode (front/src/config/demo.js) so that the demo website is working without a backend? (if needed) See https://demo.gladysassistant.com.

NOTE: these things are not required to open a PR and can be done afterwards / while the PR is open.

Description of change

Do you think this change could also impact Zigbee2mqtt backups? For instance, if someone is using the old driver and moves to a new Gladys installation with the new driver, would it break the restore process?

From this part, no issue
Koenkk/zigbee2mqtt#21462 (comment)

Coordinator Backup & Restore

• If you have an ezsp v12 backup that you've used for testing before, this should restore it the same. ✅
• If you had been using v13 for previous ezsp tests (no backup available), and you keep your network settings in configuration.yaml the same (meaning they will match that of the adapter the last time it ran), after swapping for ember, it should simply take over where you left off (and this time you should get a backup file out of it as a bonus!).

⚠️ Do we need to check listed dongle between here and in Gladys ?

[relativeci]

#2933 Bundle Size — 10.41MiB (0%).

084e89e(current) vs e9b3211 master#2931(baseline)

Warning

Bundle contains 3 duplicate packages – View duplicate packages

Bundle metrics  no changes

	Current #2933	Baseline #2931
Initial JS	5.64MiB	5.64MiB
Initial CSS	304.89KiB	304.89KiB
Cache Invalidation	0%	0%
Chunks	51	51
Assets	173	173
Modules	1511	1511
Duplicate Modules	21	21
Duplicate Code	0.83%	0.83%
Packages	124	124
Duplicate Packages	3	3

Bundle size by type  no changes

	Current #2933	Baseline #2931
JS	7.43MiB	7.43MiB
IMG	2.54MiB	2.54MiB
CSS	321.79KiB	321.79KiB
Fonts	93.55KiB	93.55KiB
Other	17.79KiB	17.79KiB
HTML	13.58KiB	13.58KiB

Bundle analysis report Branch cicoub13:fix-2191 Project dashboard

---

^{Generated by RelativeCI Documentation Report issue}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.53%. Comparing base (e9b3211) to head (084e89e).
Report is 44 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2196   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.53%   98.53%           
=======================================
  Files         876      876           
  Lines       14420    14420           
=======================================
  Hits        14209    14209           
  Misses        211      211           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Pierre-Gilles]

@cicoub13 Thanks for the PR! Were you able to test the PR? :)

[cicoub13]

@cicoub13 Thanks for the PR! Were you able to test the PR? :)

Not yet 😐

[Pierre-Gilles]

@cicoub13 If you need extra hardware to be able to test this without touching your main instance, don't hesitate 😄 (extra dongle, extra Linux server, anything)

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[lephuvu1994]

@Pierre-Gilles @cicoub13 . I'm running this update with the Sonoff E USB, and I find it very stable and fast with this new version of Zigbee2MQTT. I upgraded simultaneously to Zigbee2MQTT version 2.1.3. A great upgrade. I would recommend everyone to use the E version after this update.