-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
Cleanup stale lock files in the .lsp-locks directory #6816
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left a few optional minor improvements (maybe opinionated here); nothing major - feel free to use them 😄
LGTM 👍
This made me check the forc locks and same thing happens there too, without any active forc process I have more than 50 locks in edit: opened #6818 |
New test seems to be flakey, getting some failures in CI:
|
## Description I noticed there were quite a few old stale lock files in the `.lsp-locks` directory. We now check that the PID is active for each file in this directory, if it's not active then it's removed. ## Checklist - [ ] I have linked to any relevant issues. - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [ ] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book). - [ ] If my change requires substantial documentation changes, I have [requested support from the DevRel team](https://github.com/FuelLabs/devrel-requests/issues/new/choose) - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [x] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary `Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant. - [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md). - [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers. Co-authored-by: Sophie Dankel <[email protected]>
…s` crate (#7055) ## Description adds the mark-flaky-tests crate so we can use `#[flaky]` above tests that might fail. Also improves the `test_cleanup_stale_files` test which was added in #6816 ## Checklist - [x] I have linked to any relevant issues. - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [ ] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book). - [ ] If my change requires substantial documentation changes, I have [requested support from the DevRel team](https://github.com/FuelLabs/devrel-requests/issues/new/choose) - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [x] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary `Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant. - [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md). - [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
Description
I noticed there were quite a few old stale lock files in the
.lsp-locks
directory. We now check that the PID is active for each file in this directory, if it's not active then it's removed.Checklist
Breaking*
orNew Feature
labels where relevant.