Tactics: return proper errors when guards fail for typing reflection #405
Annotations
11 warnings
|
The Ubuntu-20.04 brownout takes place from 2025-02-01. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/11101
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
FStar.TSet.fst#L27
(318) * Warning 318 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.TSet.fst(27,4-27,7):
- Values of type `set` cannot be erased during extraction, but the
`must_erase_for_extraction` attribute claims that it can.
- Please remove the attribute.
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
FStar.UInt.fsti#L435
(271) * Warning 271 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.UInt.fsti(435,8-435,51):
- Pattern uses these theory symbols or terms that should not be in an SMT
pattern:
Prims.op_Subtraction
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
FStar.UInt.fsti#L435
(271) * Warning 271 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.UInt.fst(293,8-293,25):
- Pattern uses these theory symbols or terms that should not be in an SMT
pattern:
Prims.op_Subtraction
- See also /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.UInt.fsti(435,8-435,51)
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
FStar.UInt.fsti#L435
(271) * Warning 271 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.UInt.fsti(435,8-435,51):
- Pattern uses these theory symbols or terms that should not be in an SMT
pattern:
Prims.op_Subtraction
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
FStar.GhostSet.fst#L23
(318) * Warning 318 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.GhostSet.fst(23,4-23,7):
- Values of type `set` cannot be erased during extraction, but the
`must_erase_for_extraction` attribute claims that it can.
- Please remove the attribute.
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
dummy#L1
(242) * Warning 242 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.WellFounded.fst(122,0-131,33):
- Definitions of inner let-rec aux and its enclosing top-level letbinding are
not encoded to the solver, you will only be able to reason with their types
- Also see: /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.WellFounded.fst(86,12-86,15)
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
dummy#L1
(242) * Warning 242 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.WellFounded.fst(122,0-131,33):
- Definitions of inner let-rec aux and its enclosing top-level letbinding are
not encoded to the solver, you will only be able to reason with their types
- Also see: /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.WellFounded.fst(126,12-126,15)
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
dummy#L1
(242) * Warning 242 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.LexicographicOrdering.fsti(187,0-194,59):
- Definitions of inner let-rec lex_t_wf_aux_y and its enclosing top-level
letbinding are not encoded to the solver, you will only be able to reason
with their types
- Also see: /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.LexicographicOrdering.fst(75,14-75,28)
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
dummy#L1
(242) * Warning 242 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.LexicographicOrdering.fsti(187,0-194,59):
- Definitions of inner let-rec get_acc and its enclosing top-level letbinding
are not encoded to the solver, you will only be able to reason with their
types
- Also see: /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/FStar.LexicographicOrdering.fst(124,10-124,17)
|
|
Run eval $(opam env) && make -kj$(nproc) ADMIT=1:
FStar.MST.fst#L222
(330) * Warning 330 at /home/runner/work/FStar/FStar/fstar/ulib/experimental/FStar.MST.fst(222,43-222,55):
- Polymonadic binds ((DIV, MSTATE) |> MSTATE) in this case) is an experimental
feature;it is subject to some redesign in the future. Please keep us
informed (on github etc.) about how you are using it
|
Loading