[AN-370] When converting submission to a TSV, access data by the headers

[lucymcnatt]

Jira Ticket: https://broadworkbench.atlassian.net/browse/AN-370

Summary of changes:

What

Iteration on this PR that added 'N/A' as a the cost when none existed, this makes sure all the columns are in the same order when downloading submission details by accessing the columns by the header names

Why

So that the columns are consistent when downloading submission details

Testing strategy

I tested by replacing
await Workspaces(signal).workspace(namespace, name).submission(submissionId).get()
with a truncated version of the response in the affected user's workspace (shown below)
Then going to the job history page, clicking on a workflow run and checking that the submission downloaded with the correct columns (includes a cost column, null values are N/A and the values are in the correct columns)

const test_sub = {
  cost: 206.53085,
  deleteIntermediateOutputFiles: false,
  ignoreEmptyOutputs: false,
  memoryRetryMultiplier: 1.2,
  methodConfigurationName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample_jyq0UzzW1ow',
  methodConfigurationNamespace: 'cds-pipelines',
  status: 'Done',
  submissionDate: '2024-09-04T16:44:49.266Z',
  submissionEntity: {
    entityType: 'sample_set',
    entityName: 'warp_eval',
  },
  submissionId: '40c28f7b-88e2-40c1-8d1d-66b4b8524030',
  submissionRoot: 'gs://fc-secure-c3953e85-3494-484e-89aa-8c7a5f65f194/submissions/intermediates/40c28f7b-88e2-40c1-8d1d-66b4b8524030',
  submitter: '[email protected]',
  useCallCache: true,
  useReferenceDisks: false,
  userComment: '',
  workflows: [
    {
      inputResolutions: [
        {
          inputName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample.cram_ref_fasta',
          value: 'gs://ccleparams/reference/hg19/Homo_sapiens_assembly19.fasta',
        },
        {
          inputName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample.workflow_source_url',
          value:
            'https://gist.githubusercontent.com/cds-github-apps/1650f7e6e7bc2f9db8621b5411166ea3/raw/1806ad5e7c703b9a714745684ecedec362b0ce78/preprocess_wgs_sample.wdl',
        },
        {
          inputName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample.workflow_version',
          value: '1.0',
        },
      ],
      messages: [],
      status: 'Failed',
      statusLastChangedDate: '2024-09-04T16:45:45.584Z',
      workflowEntity: {
        entityType: 'sample',
        entityName: 'CDS-00Nrci',
      },
      workflowId: 'a41a70a6-0151-4fcc-aed5-f1ae5e1b3d79',
    },
    {
      cost: 4.615543,
      inputResolutions: [
        {
          inputName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample.workflow_source_url',
          value:
            'https://gist.githubusercontent.com/cds-github-apps/1650f7e6e7bc2f9db8621b5411166ea3/raw/1806ad5e7c703b9a714745684ecedec362b0ce78/preprocess_wgs_sample.wdl',
        },
        {
          inputName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample.workflow_version',
          value: '1.0',
        },
      ],
      messages: [],
      status: 'Succeeded',
      statusLastChangedDate: '2024-09-05T14:25:05.674Z',
      workflowEntity: {
        entityType: 'sample',
        entityName: 'CDS-0AZRB4',
      },
      workflowId: '41c2c859-b95d-4f88-8683-1cd6e6ce07c0',
    },
    {
      cost: 0.001705,
      inputResolutions: [
        {
          inputName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample.workflow_source_url',
          value:
            'https://gist.githubusercontent.com/cds-github-apps/1650f7e6e7bc2f9db8621b5411166ea3/raw/1806ad5e7c703b9a714745684ecedec362b0ce78/preprocess_wgs_sample.wdl',
        },
        {
          inputName: 'preprocess_wgs_sample.workflow_version',
          value: '1.0',
        },
      ],
      messages: [],
      status: 'Failed',
      statusLastChangedDate: '2024-09-04T17:01:07.925Z',
      workflowEntity: {
        entityType: 'sample',
        entityName: 'CDS-2uvoSr',
      },
      workflowId: 'fc4733ab-4b0a-4adb-9d39-ad003d4e978c',
    },
  ],
};

[kevinmarete]

I wasn't able to test under the specified conditions, but the code looks good to me. I added some optional comments for consideration.

[kevinpalis]

Apologies. I just saw this.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud