-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Adds build job to needs list for safer deploy #1235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| environment: | ||
| name: ${{ (github.ref == 'refs/heads/master' && 'production') || 'staging' }} | ||
| needs: [lint, test] | ||
| needs: [lint, test, build] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What scenario does this prevent against? If the build job would fail, wouldn't the yarn run build step in this deployment job fail also and abort the deployment anyway?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's true. It was my thought that that increases the time it takes for the workflow to process. If build fails, it didn't seem practical to re-run build in the deployment job despite failure. Maybe I am misunderstanding it. I guess it doesn't matter, since build will be flagged as fail anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good point that it avoids rebuilding if the first build fails. Thanks for thinking of that improvement!
I'm thinking that this will make deployments slower though when the build succeeds. Now it will have to build, wait, then rebuild and deploy. Before the two builds could run in parallel and now they must run sequentially. I lean towards optimizing for the speed of deploying successful builds. Although in practice, building usually takes only ~15 seconds longer than running the tests, so this change wouldn't slow things down too much.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In practice, I prefer that we have a successful build first before trying to deploy. I know this is happening anyway, as the deploy job runs a build.
I'm not fussed; I can go either way.
I will say our normal process is to build, and then once it's successful, we deploy. MPDX works this way.
Since we build on the CI when asking Amplify to deploy. Then Amplify runs a build to deploy.
dr-bizz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind the change Zach is requesting
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.