Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove legacy code suggestions feature from review tool #1416

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 25, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Dec 25, 2024

User description

#1415


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Removed the legacy code suggestions feature from the review tool, as it has been replaced by the improve tool
  • Removed configuration options related to code suggestions:
    • num_code_suggestions
    • inline_code_comments
    • ask_and_reflect
  • Updated documentation to reflect these changes and direct users to use the improve tool instead
  • Removed code feedback processing and markdown conversion functionality
  • Updated tests to remove code suggestions related test cases
  • Cleaned up configuration files and review prompts

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
pr_agent.py
Remove reflect and review configuration                                   

pr_agent/agent/pr_agent.py

  • Removed code related to reflect_and_review action
+0/-2     
utils.py
Remove code feedback markdown conversion                                 

pr_agent/algo/utils.py

  • Removed code_feedback section from markdown conversion
+0/-16   
pr_reviewer.py
Remove code suggestions and inline comments functionality

pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py

  • Removed num_code_suggestions configuration
  • Removed inline code comments functionality
  • Removed code feedback processing and publishing
  • +0/-62   
    Tests
    test_convert_to_markdown.py
    Update tests to remove code feedback assertions                   

    tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py

    • Updated tests to remove code_feedback related test cases
    +3/-6     
    Documentation
    review.md
    Update documentation to remove code suggestions feature   

    docs/docs/tools/review.md

  • Removed documentation for num_code_suggestions and
    inline_code_comments
  • Updated documentation to reflect removal of code suggestions feature
  • +5/-17   
    automations_and_usage.md
    Update automation examples for code suggestions removal   

    docs/docs/usage-guide/automations_and_usage.md

  • Updated example configuration to remove num_code_suggestions parameter

  • +1/-1     
    Configuration changes
    configuration.toml
    Remove legacy code suggestions configuration                         

    pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

    • Removed legacy configuration options for code suggestions
    +0/-3     
    pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
    Remove code suggestions from review prompts                           

    pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml

    • Removed code suggestions related prompts and model definitions
    +0/-42   

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    🎫 Ticket compliance analysis ✅

    1415 - Fully compliant

    Compliant requirements:

    • Remove legacy code suggestions feature from review tool
    • Remove configuration options: num_code_suggestions, inline_code_comments, ask_and_reflect
    • Update documentation to reflect changes and direct users to use improve tool
    • Remove code feedback processing and markdown conversion functionality
    • Update tests to remove code suggestions test cases
    • Clean up configuration files and review prompts
    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 95
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No major issues detected

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Dec 25, 2024

    /improve

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 25, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Latest suggestions up to 83e68f1

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    General
    Enhance error logging to provide more context about failed operations

    Add error handling or logging details about why the command failed. Simply logging
    "Unknown command" provides limited debugging information.

    pr_agent/agent/pr_agent.py [75-77]

     if action not in command2class:
    -    get_logger().error(f"Unknown command: {action}")
    +    get_logger().error(f"Unknown command '{action}'. Valid commands are: {list(command2class.keys())}")
         return False
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion improves error logging by adding the list of valid commands, which helps users quickly identify and fix command usage issues. This is a meaningful improvement for debugging and user experience.

    6
    • Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.

    Previous suggestions

    ✅ Suggestions up to commit 495c1eb
    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    General
    ✅ Improve error logging for better debugging and monitoring of unknown commands
    Suggestion Impact:Changed the log level from debug to error when encountering unknown commands, exactly as suggested

    code diff:

    -            get_logger().debug(f"Unknown command: {action}")
    +            get_logger().error(f"Unknown command: {action}")

    Add error handling or logging when an unknown command is encountered to help with
    debugging and monitoring.

    pr_agent/agent/pr_agent.py [78-80]

     if action not in command2class:
    -    get_logger().debug(f"Unknown command: {action}")
    +    get_logger().error(f"Unknown command: {action}")
         return False
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

    Why: While the suggestion to change debug to error level logging is valid, it's a minor improvement as the current debug logging is already sufficient for tracking unknown commands.

    3
    Possible issue
    Simplify null check and prevent potential NoneType errors

    Add error handling for the case when markdown_text is None to avoid potential
    NoneType errors.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py [260-261]

    -if markdown_text == None or len(markdown_text) == 0:
    +if not markdown_text:
         markdown_text = ""
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 2

    Why: The suggestion to use 'if not markdown_text' is a minor style improvement. The existing code is already safe and handles None values correctly.

    2

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 6540e2c into main Dec 25, 2024
    2 checks passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/remove_review_suggestions branch December 25, 2024 06:26
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants