Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved asynchronous code in Marten tests #7747

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

glen-84
Copy link
Collaborator

@glen-84 glen-84 commented Nov 21, 2024

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

  • Improved asynchronous code in Marten tests.

I missed this when making these methods async.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.18%. Comparing base (2f07470) to head (9f814e8).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main-version-14.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           main-version-14    #7747      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            74.17%   74.18%   +0.01%     
===================================================
  Files                 2859     2859              
  Lines               149427   149427              
  Branches             17348    17348              
===================================================
+ Hits                110837   110852      +15     
+ Misses               32799    32784      -15     
  Partials              5791     5791              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.18% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@michaelstaib michaelstaib merged commit 4b5f44f into main-version-14 Nov 21, 2024
102 checks passed
@michaelstaib michaelstaib deleted the gai/improve-async-code branch November 21, 2024 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants