fix(parachain): use correct type for ErasureChunk.Proof #4670
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
haikoschol
requested review from
EclesioMeloJunior,
jimjbrettj and
timwu20
as code owners
haikoschol
requested review from
axaysagathiya,
freddyli7 and
EclesioMeloJunior
and removed request for
timwu20,
EclesioMeloJunior and
jimjbrettj
EclesioMeloJunior
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2025
EclesioMeloJunior
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: Diego <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
This PR changes the type of
availabilitystore.ErasureChunk.Prooffrom[]byteto[][]byte.Additionally it adds the function
erasure.BranchHash()and uses it in the availability distribution subsystem to validate erasure chunks retrieved byfetchChunkTaskobjects.Tests
Issues
#4597