-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 217
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added time encoder #912
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
added time encoder #912
Conversation
Hi @07pepa , |
36be7ab
to
47a6c77
Compare
Hi @07pepa , |
8087d7c
to
b0e59ae
Compare
lets wait how pydantic will resolve this here pydantic/pydantic#9571 |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I read the code and I think everything is fine. My question is why GitHub Actions doesn't run the jobs. But, if the tests are passed, I approve this PR.
@Riverfount there is preaty nasty bug in pydantic/pydantic#9571 we should wait how they resolve it IMHO it would be bad if implementation would differ from theirs and it currently does and bypasses pydantic |
@Riverfount can you remove you approve ? i know this is not usual request... but... in this case is better to wait |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Waiting pydantic bug fix.
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
I have added time encoded however i suspect there may be issue in pydantic ( speed date) itself see pydantic/speedate#62