Skip to content

Add samples for AppConfig Pageable GetLabels with comparisons of what we'd expect the user experience to be. #6338

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

ahsonkhan
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #6292
The expected user experience is under #if 0 for now since it won't compile.

The goal here is to leverage the hero scenario samples for AppConfig to concretely highlight and track the gap between what is generated today vs what we want the end user experience and API design to be.

These particular endpoints highlight newer emitter issues around pageable correctness for url construction from nextpagetokens, and the general pageable pattern:
https://github.com/Azure/autorest.cpp/issues/466
https://github.com/Azure/autorest.cpp/issues/427

Additionally, it requires follow-up on client.tsp modification (assuming TCGC and the emitter support the @alternateType decorator) and investigating a missing response header:
#6335
#6337

@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan added the App Configuration Azure.ApplicationModel.Configuration label Jan 13, 2025
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

API change check

API changes are not detected in this pull request.

@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan merged commit 514c4cc into Azure:main Jan 14, 2025
50 checks passed
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan deleted the PageableSample branch January 14, 2025 07:20
LarryOsterman pushed a commit to LarryOsterman/azure-sdk-for-cpp that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
App Configuration Azure.ApplicationModel.Configuration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants