We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Source:
> [!NOTE] Title > Body goes here
Result:
> > \[!NOTE\] Title > Body goes here
Expected result would look identical to source.
It looks like this was a known issue that couldn't be fixed because of lack of support for CommonMark. However, it seems like there is some support for this syntax in pulldown-cmark?.
I'd be happy to write a PR to preserve the original callout syntax during conversion if it would be welcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That would definitely be welcome, provided there's tests to go along with it 😄 (CONTRIBUTING has some pointers)
Might take me a while to review it or get back to you though, life is keeping me pretty busy at the moment
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Source:
Result:
Expected result would look identical to source.
It looks like this was a known issue that couldn't be fixed because of lack of support for CommonMark. However, it seems like there is some support for this syntax in pulldown-cmark?.
I'd be happy to write a PR to preserve the original callout syntax during conversion if it would be welcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: