-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why does ribotish call so many ORFs compared to price and ribocode #36
Comments
It depends on the running mode (-t/--framebest etc.) and pvalue/FDR parameters. |
In the plot figure, the green frame in the annotated ORF has many RPF counts. The significance is to test if the green frame RPFs are higher than RPFs in other frames in the ORF region. From the figure I think it is likely significant. The P-site file does not show all the data in the transcript (NOC2L?). |
There are GTG TIS codon prediction results, while the figure only show ATG results. Adding '--alt' option in the transplot module. The 5'UTR ORF at 15-321 corresonds to the red RPF signals. The CTG 314-668 5'UTR ORF corresonds to the blue signals, The 44-1838 ORF is also blue. The CDSFrameOverlap mark means there's an annotated ORF here by annother transcript annotation. |
If you have weixin/wechat, you can add me by my id. |
Hello,
I used the same dataset to call ORFs and found that the results from Ribotish are several times more than those from other software like Price and Ribocode. Which ones are accurate, and how should I understand this situation?
Best regards,
Tian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: