Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
I agree! I was just about to make a post just like this, but you already did it! +1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm going to bump this because I think this makes a lot of sense. Especially in regards to the fact that you can have folders & sub folders for pinned tabs, which likely wont be possible with firefoxes tab group implementation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I also agree. Nested folders are significantly superior to tab groups for organization and can be easily stored as bookmarks behind the scenes. When I used Arc, I did not miss bookmarks because I had spaces and pinned tab folders. And that felt so much better than bookmarks and tab groups ever did. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Description
Pinned tabs should be regarded as bookmarks: when I pin a tab in a workspace, the URL of the pin tab should also be visible in my bookmarks, in a special folder named "Pinned tabs/[Workspace Name]".
Essentials could also be saved directly in the root directory "Pinned tabs".
Why?
Conceptually, pinned tabs and bookmarks are the same thing: they are URLs I want to keep for later.
Plus, merging the two concepts allows to easily bring new features for pinned tabs that already exist for bookmarks:
This would also match Arc's native behavior of pinned tabs (#2829)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions