We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently,@ is used to represent an intervention in a counterfactual variable, such as:
@
Y @ X
Recommendation is to convert this to:
Y(x)
where lower case variables (by convention) represent intervention variables.
Also consider renaming InteventionVariable to Value or CounterfactualValue.
Also, to represent the value of a counterfactual variable, we currently use this notation:
+Y @ -X
Recommend this update:
Y(-x) == y
So now, probabilties can be a dictionary of counterfactual variables and values:
Prob = {Y @ x : -y, Z @ d : z, D : -d} Prob[Y@x]
This could be represented as a constructor like this:
Pr[Y(x)== y, Z(d) == z, D == -d]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently,
@
is used to represent an intervention in a counterfactual variable, such as:Recommendation is to convert this to:
where lower case variables (by convention) represent intervention variables.
Also consider renaming InteventionVariable to Value or CounterfactualValue.
Also, to represent the value of a counterfactual variable, we currently use this notation:
Recommend this update:
So now, probabilties can be a dictionary of counterfactual variables and values:
This could be represented as a constructor like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: