Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-224(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-384(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports #11

Open
Neustradamus opened this issue Nov 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Member

Neustradamus commented Nov 14, 2020

Can you add supports of :

  • SCRAM-SHA-1
  • SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-224
  • SCRAM-SHA-224-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-256
  • SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-384
  • SCRAM-SHA-384-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-512
  • SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA3-512
  • SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS

"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".

https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html

-PLUS variants:

LDAP:

  • RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803

HTTP:

2FA:

IANA:

Linked to:

@Neustradamus Neustradamus changed the title SCRAM-SHA-1-(PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-224(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-384(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-224(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-384(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports Nov 14, 2020
@atomatt
Copy link
Collaborator

atomatt commented Nov 14, 2020

Hi! Thanks for the interest, but I've not been maintaining this library because I have not used XMPP for many years. If you believe it's a useful package, would you be interested in taking it over?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants