New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🚀 WireMock 3.0 - Sep 2023 #2133
Comments
Would be awesome with a separate Jetty 10 version too :) |
@henrik242 what purpose would that serve when we're already supporting Jetty 11? |
@tomakehurst Jetty 10 uses |
And switching to the standalone version isn't helping you here? |
@henrik242 Also https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-testcontainers-java as an option. It is far from feature parity with WireMock, but it will keep improving. If I know the use-cases you implement, I think we could look into that together |
I'm a big wiremock fan, thanks for a great tool 🍻 I'm just adding wiremock to yet another project and I'm not sure which version to choose. Would be helpful to have a list of compatibility breaking changes or even better, a migration guide, so I can estimate the cost of starting with 2.x and migrating later. |
@bennyorca You can see a list of already integrated and upcoming compatibility breaking changes in https://github.com/orgs/wiremock/projects/5/views/1 . I marked all of them My recommendation would be to start from the current 3.0.0 Beta which is also stable enough IMHO |
FTR the release bits are out. We will be doing the announcements in a few days after the release is considered stable. https://github.com/orgs/wiremock/projects/5 is used to track subsequent issues and regressions |
This is a placeholder issue for WireMock 3.0 which will be the next compatibility-breaking release. If you are interested in the upcoming release, please join us on Slack! http://slack.wiremock.org/
Project dashboard
Key scope items
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: