Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Many trees in vector tiles have missing or incorrectly named fields #91

Open
fwextensions opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@fwextensions
Copy link
Member

None of the trees in Vancouver, for instance, seem to have a common name specified, which is required to make any changes or updates to that in the backend. So the FE has to choose some arbitrary way of setting that field to make an edit.

All tree data in the vector tiles should have consistent naming and formats. Trees without required fields should get defaults or not be included in the tiles.

@fwextensions
Copy link
Member Author

fwextensions commented Apr 13, 2022

None of the trees in Escondido have any name or species info, which makes them uneditable. If these trees are going to be included in the vector tiles, the UI needs special handling for them.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant