-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ANP-RNN 'use_deterministic_path'= False? #2
Comments
Your right it probably should be true, although I'm not sure the Deterministic Path helps much.
Sure, I may need to see you code first though
What do you mean by that? I put "time since now' as a feature in order to encode times. |
Repository owner
deleted a comment from
mr-robot77
Feb 23, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi there,
I am just wondering if you forgot to set 'use_deterministic_path'= True for ANP-RNN, since in the paper the authors indicate so, and you obviously have already set cross-validations.
https://github.com/3springs/attentive-neural-processes/blob/af431a267bad309b2d5698f25551986e2c4e7815/neural_processes/models/neural_process/lightning.py#L189-L195
BTW, I was trying to replicate the experiment on GP dataset, and I have already implemented an ANP. Although the architecture of mine is slightly different from yours, I assume I will just need to replace all the MLPs with LSTMs plus sequential encodings of the input, output, right? However, mine result was really bad, when I sorted my x_context, x_target, the model only seems to be able to predict a few points and predicts flat curves afterwards. Could you please share with me any hints regarding this?
Your help is very much appreciated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: