Path to publishing!

[shawna-slh]

From in-person meeting with Denis, Jenn, Mike, Sharron, and Shawn on 15 October 2024.

Agreed on:

• for the resource on the WAI website, focus on the provided mappings that most people will use (rather than organizations creating their own customized mapping, which likely few will do)
  • specifically, that means using the main page approach worked on with EOWG
  • WAI website will include the succinct info (not the longer Introduction and FAQ, which could be published through the Community Group)
• use existing WAI site styles and components, e.g., https://master--wai-arrm.netlify.app/planning/arrm/roles/
• publish it as a 'draft' with call for community input through the ARRM CG

To be confirmed:

• change 'checkpoints' to 'tasks'
• simplify the table structure throughout (e.g., see suggested headings in simple table vs complex headings)

New ideas from Shawn & Kevin:

• consider how to present the 'starter list' of ~15 tasks, the helpful categories (Images and Graphs, Document Structure, etc.), and multiple use cases
• for first phase provide CSV (and excel and other formats), and consider interactivity for next iteration, see issue: CVS file (or interactive tool [future enhancement])

To do:

• [cancelled - we're OK calling it a decision tree!] Denis and team provide suggestions for formerly-known-as 'Decision Tree'. Please put aside past history and think about this from new users' perspectives. For context, see the section Customizing ARRM for Your Situation
• Shawn confirm Kevin OK with "task number" for column heading
• Mike Gifford, or Ken F (WAI staff), or someone else explore options for single source of data that is: 1. used for displaying the full table and the role-specific tables, 2. available as CSV
• Shawn finish incorporating input from Kevin
• Mike update tables
• Denis or someone else list contributors in the Acknowledgement page — preview, edit

[dboudreau]

I am in favor of most of these suggestions, except for the "new ideas". I will want to discuss those more before any decision is made. For everything else, it seems aligned with what we discussed.

As for the contributors, here's the list, as per the wiki page (with minor edits):

Current contributors

As of this writing, the following people are actively contributing to the ARRM project (in alphabetical order):

• Denis Boudreau (Inklusiv),
• Jennifer Chadwick (Independent),
• Sean Kelly (UnitedHealth Group),
• Michael Mistak (independent),
• Bill Tyler (UnitedHealth Group),
• Karen Hawkins (Level Access),
• Mike Gifford (CivicActions),
• Lewis Phillips (independent), and
• Frankie Wolf (independent)

Past contributors

The ARRM team would like to thank the following people for their precious contributions over the years:

• Stéphane Deschamps (Orange Telecom),
• Caitlin Geier (Deque Systems), and
• Julianna Rowsell (Adobe).

[mgifford]

We agreed to drop the organizations, so rewriting this:
 

Current contributors

As of this writing, the following people are actively contributing to the ARRM project (in alphabetical order):

• Denis Boudreau,
• Jennifer Chadwick,
• Sean Kelly,
• Michael Mistak,
• Bill Tyler,
• Karen Hawkins,
• Mike Gifford,
• Lewis Phillips, and
• Frankie Wolf.

Past contributors

The ARRM team would like to thank the following people for their precious contributions over the years:

• Stéphane Deschamps, 
• Caitlin Geier, and
• Julianna Rowsell.