Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publishing icons for various UI sizes (DIPs) #568

Closed
mastiz opened this issue Apr 26, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Publishing icons for various UI sizes (DIPs) #568

mastiz opened this issue Apr 26, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@mastiz
Copy link

mastiz commented Apr 26, 2017

I was wondering if the following feature request has been discussed.

Some sites like cnn.com or reddit.com publish icons not only of different resolution, but also of different content: presumably intended to be used in UIs of different DIP size. In a high density screen, say mobile, fitting a high-resolution image into a small UI (in DIPs) leads to a too detailed, hard-to-see image.

This spec could be extended with some additional field per icon.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

We attempted this previously, (via the density member), but we had to remove it. Authors got confused and it ended up doing more harm than good 😭

@mastiz
Copy link
Author

mastiz commented May 5, 2017

Thanks! Can you please provide some links to the past discussions, assuming they're accessible? Within Chrome, the use of manifest icons for certain UIs has been considered a regression for the examples I listed earlier, so we might need to combine manifest and non-manifest icons depending on the UI, which doesn't seem easier to get right by authors.

@mastiz
Copy link
Author

mastiz commented May 15, 2017

Friendly ping, thanks.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Apologies, I missed this. Here is all the issues that mention "density":
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aclosed%20%20density

The one that pertains to this in particular:
#450

@mastiz
Copy link
Author

mastiz commented May 16, 2017

Thanks Marcos, that's very useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants