-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publishing icons for various UI sizes (DIPs) #568
Comments
We attempted this previously, (via the |
Thanks! Can you please provide some links to the past discussions, assuming they're accessible? Within Chrome, the use of manifest icons for certain UIs has been considered a regression for the examples I listed earlier, so we might need to combine manifest and non-manifest icons depending on the UI, which doesn't seem easier to get right by authors. |
Friendly ping, thanks. |
Apologies, I missed this. Here is all the issues that mention "density": The one that pertains to this in particular: |
Thanks Marcos, that's very useful. |
I was wondering if the following feature request has been discussed.
Some sites like cnn.com or reddit.com publish icons not only of different resolution, but also of different content: presumably intended to be used in UIs of different DIP size. In a high density screen, say mobile, fitting a high-resolution image into a small UI (in DIPs) leads to a too detailed, hard-to-see image.
This spec could be extended with some additional field per icon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: