-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conditions for conservation analysis of syntenic blocks #45
Comments
Hi Lucía, The way the comparison across species was carried out in the paper was by using the syntenic regions in bedpe format as the input pairs file for Using the syntenic regions as the region pairs will compare the whole syntenic region in one species to the other species, so if your syntenic regions are very large I suppose you might want to create smaller regions that tile across them to perform higher-resolution analysis. I haven't used CHESS for cross-species comparison myself, but I believe @nickmachnik did that part of the analysis for the paper, so he may be able to help if you need more input. |
Hi, Many thanks for your helpful reply, I wasn't aware that I can use the syntenic regions as a pairs file, I will definitely try that. However, as you have pointed out, the syntenic regions are quite large and I would like to perform a higher-resolution analysis, so any more help would be welcome. Thanks again, Lucía |
Since the syntenic regions likely have different sizes in the different species and the change in size may not be even across the region, I would probably start by taking the syntenic regions in one species as a reference, splitting these into sub-regions (by tiling across them), and then lifting over these sub-regions to the other genome to find the matching syntenic sub-region to use for constructing the pairs file. You would need to write custom code to create these sub-regions, there isn't anything built-in to CHESS for this. Note that the size of the regions you use for CHESS analysis needs to be at least 20x the resolution of your Hi-C matrix, and personally I usually have better results using 100x the resolution. That is, for a 5 kb resolution Hi-C matrix, 20x would be 100 kb regions and 100x would be 500 kb regions. So bear this in mind when deciding what size to use for your sub-regions. |
Hi both, I'm also interested in performing a cross-species comparison with chess. I wonder if the whole syntenic blocks can be used in chess, or I should splice each of the blocks into sliding-windowing similar as produced by Many thanks Yang |
Hi Yang, Generally, you should be able to use whole syntenic blocks without splitting. |
Hi!
I am analyzing the level of chromatin conformation conservation between different species, and chess looks like the perfect tool for me! I already have the synteny blocks between the species I am working with, however I am not sure on what window size or step should I use. First, I would like to replicate your paper's analysis but I don't know which conditions were used, could you help me with this? Do you have any suggestion on what parameters should I take into account when running this type of analysis? Is chess sensible enough to address TAD variation in interspecies analysis?
Many thanks
Lucía
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: