-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathprogram-successes.php
38 lines (37 loc) · 1.64 KB
/
program-successes.php
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
<?php
$pagename = 'Overall Program Success';
include("template-top.php");
?>
<div id="content" class="row">
<div class="columns">
<h1><?php echo $pagename; ?></h1>
<h2>Results</h2>
<p>Over 350 enrolled (20-25/month), >80% choose to participate</p>
<h2>Improved Care</h2>
<p>Marked improvements from baseline in key processes of care include</p>
<ul>
<li> 60% get home visit within 72 hours of discharge</li>
<li> 80% get phone follow-up within 30 days</li>
<li> 80% get primary care follow-up within 30 days</li>
</ul>
<h2>Improved Outcomes</h2>
<p>Marked improvements for 2014 compared with similar controls</p>
<ul>
<li>30% - in hospitalizations</li>
<li>44% - in readmissions</li>
<li>52% - in ED visits</li>
</ul>
<h2>Return on Investment</h2>
<p>2 approaches* for comparing costs for SafeMed vs. controls gave similar results</p>
<ul>
<li>Total projected savings = $1.2 M or $4,584 to $6,276 per SafeMed enrollee</li>
<li>Projected net cost savings =$127,664 to $910,304 per year after costs</li>
</ul>
<p class="panel">* Lower bound estimates based on analyses using TennCare claims data only to compare total
paid claims for
full follow-up period controlling for differences in baseline costs. Upper bound estimates based on
Methodist utilization data only to calculate actual & projected hospital & ED visits for SafeMed vs.
controls.</p>
</div>
</div>
<?php include("template-bottom.php"); ?>