Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
132 lines (75 loc) · 3.64 KB

team-practices.md

File metadata and controls

132 lines (75 loc) · 3.64 KB

FOIA Team Practices

This document describes the conventions the FOIA team has agreed to work under. For information about licensing, code of conduct and contributing to this project, see the CONTRIBUTING file.

Sprints

We do two-week sprints, with a sprint review and retro every other Tuesday and planning meeting every other Monday. We have daily standups with our 18F team and daily standups with the DOJ team.

Issues

We use Github

  • Zenhub for issue tracking. We create issues as necessary to capture stories and articulate requirements for specific tasks. Kanban tasks move through the columns from left to right. Each task represents a complete feature; each with design, implementation, and usability validation. Some issues might skip one or more of the "in progress" columns if there is no acceptance criteria for the column, like in the case of a bug. Our kanban categories for describing the state of issues are:

New

Default for created issues.

Exit criteria

  • Item has been triaged for priority.
  • Item moves to Icebox if it is low priority or to Backlog for grooming.

Icebox

The Icebox is where items go that have lower priority or we are unsure of their state. This tends to be the dumping grounds of things we'd like to do but there are many other things with higher priority.

Exit criteria

  • When reviewing priorities, we may pull items out of the Icebox.
  • Items move to Backlog for grooming.

Backlog

Groomed and ready to be pulled into the "in progress" columns for the current/upcoming sprint.

Exit criteria

  • Item has defined design, development, and UX review acceptance criteria reviewed by the Product Owner.
  • Item is groomed and shovel-ready.
  • Item has been prioritized against other work in the Backlog.
  • When a team member is ready to take on new work, they pull the first unassigned item from the top of the Backlog.

Design

The work is started or ready to be started by the design team. Limit 2 per assignee.

Exit criteria

  • Design acceptance criteria has been met.
  • Design review has been performed.
  • Any artifacts, documents, assets, or code is included in the issue and available for the team.

Dev

The work is started or ready to be started by the development team. Limit 2 per assignee.

Exit criteria

  • Development acceptance criteria has been met.
  • PRs have been peer reviewed, "Approved", and merged.
  • Design review has been performed.
  • Any artifacts, documents, assets, or code is included in the issue and available for the team.

UX review

The work is started or ready to be started by the UX team. Limit 2 per assignee.

Exit criteria

  • UX review acceptance criteria has been met.
  • Any outcomes from usability sessions are documented and any new issues are created.

Review / QA

PR opened and/or task ready for team feedback.

Exit criteria

  • Work has been peer reviewed and acceptance criteria is confirmed to have been met.

Closed

Issue completed.

Pull Requests

All code changes should happen through pull requests (PRs) to the develop branch.

New PRs should be assigned to the person who opens the PR. If a PR is not ready for review and merge, add the WIP label to it, and prefix the PR name with [WIP].

All PRs should be reviewed by one other team member. As a reviewer, you are not expected to review WIP PRs unless specifically requested. Prioritize PR reviews over other work, so that PRs do not block other team members.

When a PR has an accepted review, either the reviewer or the owner (assignee) may merge the PR.