You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're missing quite a bit of polygons along highways in our detection. I think that we should figure out some smart way of expanding it. We now do 1% over the threshold if they are adjacent but I think that we'll need to go deeper and allow extension with lower circular compactness to go beyond that 1%. Haven't looked into that yet but the most striking issues in the result are due to missing artifacts where I would expect them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@martinfleis the salt lake city one is solved by not using service roads, but i wonder whether we should keep this open to integrate the future final version of get_artifacts into FaceArtifacts, too?
We're missing quite a bit of polygons along highways in our detection. I think that we should figure out some smart way of expanding it. We now do 1% over the threshold if they are adjacent but I think that we'll need to go deeper and allow extension with lower circular compactness to go beyond that 1%. Haven't looked into that yet but the most striking issues in the result are due to missing artifacts where I would expect them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: