Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

terminology – roads, streets, edges, lines, links, etc. #141

Open
jGaboardi opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

terminology – roads, streets, edges, lines, links, etc. #141

jGaboardi opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jGaboardi
Copy link
Collaborator

Within the docs, comments, and code itself we refer variously to roads, streets, edges, lines, links, etc.

In our last meeting during the discussion where we decided the final package name we mentioned that it is nice to be agnostic in terms of types of network (streets, bike paths, waterways, etc.).

So considering this, should we be more deliberate in terminology. Perhaps (trying to) stick with the more abstract [edges, lines, links] over the more specific [roads, streets] where possible?

@anastassiavybornova
Copy link
Collaborator

@jGaboardi good point, suggestion from @martinfleis (and I agree) to first fix terminology everywhere in the paper and once that is done, propagate here

@jGaboardi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants