Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DPP - features requested for v1.0 #203

Open
onthebreeze opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

DPP - features requested for v1.0 #203

onthebreeze opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@onthebreeze
Copy link
Contributor

Impacted sections

List UNTP specification page(s) that are impacted by this issue. Eg

Issue Description

Placeholder for data requirements for v1.0 release of DPP schema - discovered during pilot testing.

@onthebreeze
Copy link
Contributor Author

Packaging object needed

There isnt an easy place to include packaging materials. Could re-use the materials object, but packaging really should be separate from product materials provenance.

@onthebreeze
Copy link
Contributor Author

conformity.topic is currently very ESG centric. What if we want to add claims like "is Halal" or "is Organic" or "has min/max alcohol content"? Do we need to extend conformity topic codes to accomodate more general product criteria?

@jballment
Copy link

Packaging object needed

There isnt an easy place to include packaging materials. Could re-use the materials object, but packaging really should be separate from product materials provenance.

Screenshot 2024-11-18 111638
We are trying to model the Ingredients and Recycling Material into a DPP. Both qualify as material and all can easily be added in materialProvenance however for display purposes using the rendering engine I need some way to distinguish between ingredients and packaging. My thought was to add a field to the untp.Materials class for materialCategory being "product", "ingredient", "packaging". I also agree that packaging is so common that a separate field in the Product class does make sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants