Help reword repetitive text #4326
-
Hello team 👋🏽 , Building off of the designs from #4324, we have a scenario where we feel that the underlined text under Another question - we feel that the prorated quantity for the month is not very prominent in the current design. Any suggestions on how could we highlight it better? Thanks for your input! Appreciate it! 🙏🏽 cc: @ConalCosgrove @jsheppard-twilio ![]() ![]() |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Disclaimer: This is a very experimental bot using OpenAI's GPT-4. The answers may not be correct, a human will review the answer and update it if necessary. Sorry, I don't know how to help with that. I did do a search though, and I managed to find these other Discussions that might be similar or related to your question. Give them a read to see if they answer your question. If they do, head back here and update this discussion and mark it as answered, pointing others to the related discussion:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For the rewording maybe you could try 'After 10,000 messages with Engagement Suite features, each additional message is $0.013.' and same for verifications 'After 4,400 successful verifications, each additional verification is $0.045.' I think that should be clear for your users, unless is necessary to lead with the price instead of the threshold. You can also reach out to @mma1504 to discuss this content. About the prorated quantity for the month, our suggestion for Meter is to put the emphasis in the number that is more valuable for the user to know, in this case I assume that would be the number of successful verifications or sent messages, and the min-max value is placed close to the main number so it's easily discoverable without competing for attention. That said, if the threshold number is equally important in your use case, you could try to to update the value label format to something like "0 of 2,000" and omit the min-max values (so is not too repetitive) something like this I also updated the labels so that the card title includes 'Engagement Suite features,' and simplified the meter label so it doesn't wrap onto two lines. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
For the rewording maybe you could try 'After 10,000 messages with Engagement Suite features, each additional message is $0.013.' and same for verifications 'After 4,400 successful verifications, each additional verification is $0.045.' I think that should be clear for your users, unless is necessary to lead with the price instead of the threshold. You can also reach out to @mma1504 to discuss this content.
About the prorated quantity for the month, our suggestion for Meter is to put the emphasis in the number that is more valuable for the user to know, in this case I assume that would be the number of successful verifications or sent messages, and the min-max value is placed close to the …