Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tables for Storage Gateway #2284

Open
judell opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add tables for Storage Gateway #2284

judell opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request new table New table request

Comments

@judell
Copy link
Contributor

judell commented Aug 28, 2024

Suggestions:

minimum required for inventory use case
list-gateways
list-tags-for-resource

likely useful to fully understand the resources a gateway "owns"
list-local-disks

for s3 gateways (required for my current investigation)
list-file-shares

for fsx gateways (not currently required)
list-file-system-associations

for tape gateways (not currently required)
list-automatic-tape-creation-policies
list-tape-pools
list-tapes

for iscsi/volume gateways (not currently required)
list-volume-initiators
list-volume-recovery-points
list-volumes

@judell judell added enhancement New feature or request new table New table request labels Aug 28, 2024
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 30 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale No recent activity has been detected on this issue/PR and it will be closed label Oct 27, 2024
@sntxrr
Copy link

sntxrr commented Nov 12, 2024

I'd love to see this get added!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale No recent activity has been detected on this issue/PR and it will be closed label Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request new table New table request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants