Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENHANCEMENTS] Add Tailscale to Global Area Network Options #4

Open
PhoenixSheppy opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@PhoenixSheppy
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No, it is a direct feature request. I don't use Zerotier, I use Tailscale as it supports SSO on the free tier.

Describe the solution you'd like
The ability to use Tailscale as a GAN option.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Wireguard is another option, or IPSec would be nice too. (raw configuration vs. using a specific service)

Additional context
https://tailscale.com/

@PhoenixSheppy PhoenixSheppy added the enhancement New feature or request label May 23, 2023
@JD-The-65th
Copy link

I think tailscale is built on wireguard, so I think wireguard and then tailscale would be nice, but take this with a pinch of salt

@tobychui
Copy link
Owner

Unfortunately I don't use Tailscale. I will keep this enhancement request open and see anyone want to pick this up and create a PR to this project.

@johnmmcgee
Copy link

I think tailscale is built on wireguard, so I think wireguard and then tailscale would be nice, but take this with a pinch of salt

I agree with a WG plugin. That would be awesome.

@ElijahHW
Copy link

Can confirm this would make this project additionally sexy if it had support for Tailscale! More and more self-hosters are turning to Tailscale due to its ease of use and generous free tier. Would highly appreciate this as a GAN option ✨

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants